I also successfully fold P6023 -- just not the evil WU in question. Currently, I've got Project 6023 (Run 0, Clone 81, Gen 45) folding on one of my Mac Minis (C2D T7600 @ 2.33GHz) with TPF=15 mins 45 sec.
Beware the evil WU!
Search found 23 matches
- Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:30 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 869
- Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:11 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 869
Re: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
Bruce -- Yes. Same machine. Between the two instances of the evil WU, the machine processed the following WUs: Assigned @ [February 26 17:35:48 UTC] Project: 6012 (Run 0, Clone 145, Gen 73) --> CoreStatus = 64 (Note that this WU was erroneously reassigned to this same machine below, even though succ...
- Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:39 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 869
Re: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
The evil WU was recently reassigned to me... Exact same symptoms... Stuck at 0% completion and using only 300% of an idle Mac Pro... Unfortunately, I wasn't around to detect the situation earlier and just detected the repeat situation. Dumping that bad WU again. (Hope it will successfully complete f...
- Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:43 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 869
Project 6023 (Run 1, Clone 36, Gen 23)
Got a strange one here... Recommend someone keep an eye out for it... Only uses 75% of dual C2D Mac Pro running latest Snow Leopard 10.6.2. Never gets to 1% frame completion -- just stays at 0% completion for hours. Normally frame times around 7 minutes... Manually terminated by user at 16:55:37 in ...
- Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:43 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 59, Clone 80, Gen 122)
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2472
Re: Project: 2671 (Run 59, Clone 80, Gen 122)
Like a bad penny, this one just came back and bit me again.
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:55 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: 2669 (Run 9, Clone 86, Gen 83)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 412
Re: 2669 (Run 9, Clone 86, Gen 83)
This one failed for me, too, but before even 1% was completed... It was running on Mac Pro with dual C2D processors and 8GB of memory assigned.
(No special action was needed to clear the bad WU -- automatically reassigned a different WU after repeated failure threshold passed.)
(No special action was needed to clear the bad WU -- automatically reassigned a different WU after repeated failure threshold passed.)
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:43 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2671 (Run 59, Clone 80, Gen 122)
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2472
Re: Project: 2671 (Run 59, Clone 80, Gen 122)
Ouch! This one got me, too...
Exact same behavior. Please flag this WU and remove it from the mix.
Exact same behavior. Please flag this WU and remove it from the mix.
- Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2669 (Run 8, Clone 98, Gen 144) will not process
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1634
Re: Project: 2669 (Run 8, Clone 98, Gen 144) will not process
Like a bad penny, this one came back to me again today! Flat-lined. Bad WU. Recommend pulling it out of the work queue.
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:32 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2669 (Run 8, Clone 98, Gen 144) will not process
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1634
Re: Project: 2669 (Run 8, Clone 98, Gen 144) will not process
Got this assigned to one of my Mac Minis... Same symptoms with the latest 2.11 core.
- Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project 2675 R3, C169 G78 atom can not be settled
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1075
Re: Project 2675 R3, C169 G78 atom can not be settled
I get the same problems with this WU. Keeps stopping all by itself after I restart it... --- Opening Log file [July 28 03:17:39 UTC] # Mac OS X SMP Console Edition ################################################ ############################################################################### Folding...
- Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:23 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2669 (Run 4, Clone 19, Gen 111)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 863
Re: Project: 2669 (Run 4, Clone 19, Gen 111)
I just got this one again!... Hmmm!!!... Deleting again and moving on.
- Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:36 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2669 (Run 4, Clone 19, Gen 111)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 863
Re: Project 2669 (Run 4, Clone 19, Gen 111)
I just got this one assigned to me this morning... Hmmm... Deleting and moving on.
- Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:34 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2669 (Run 14, Clone 166, Gen 38)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 506
Project 2669 (Run 14, Clone 166, Gen 38)
# Mac OS X SMP Console Edition ################################################ ############################################################################### Folding@Home Client Version 6.24beta http://folding.stanford.edu ##########################################################################...
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:00 am
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: folding just about the race
- Replies: 5
- Views: 849
Re: folding just about race
So true, susato... That's the reason why I select the equipment based on other longer-term factors (e.g., robustness for H/W and OS)... That's why I fold with Mac equipment.
Points are nice, but it's sustainability and support for the science that trumps all else!
Points are nice, but it's sustainability and support for the science that trumps all else!
- Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:36 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 3065 (Run 2, Clone 117, Gen 24)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 381
Re: Project: 3065 (Run 2, Clone 117, Gen 24)
@sortofageek -- I'm still having mixed success... I've been using the 6.23 public beta client, but it does not solve everything. Just had another similar failure today @ 92+% complete -- Project 3043 (Run 2, Clone 52, Gen 80)... Same failure symptoms so I didn't post and flood the boards. Alas, we p...