Folding Forum

No no, all I want to do is access F@H client on another PC over the internet so I can manage it, I don't need to control the PC it's self.

Is there a way to setup the client and control to access a client over the internet? I know how to do it locally on the LAN.
I know it will have to use proxy, just need examples using 7.6.21 F@H.

I have 2 Opteron 6276 systems, I did run Ubuntu but I now run Win 10 Pro for workstations I have these pics over on Overclockers.com, if you can post your pics to a forum, you can then link them here. https://www.overclockers.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=200718&d=1534200998 https://www...

@WhitehawkEQ: The missing DLL error occurs on 0.0.13? Which DLLs does it complain are missing? ~ John Chodera // MSKCC MSVCP140.dll on both Win 7 and Win 10 PC's with GTX 1080 cards. The GTX 1080's do fine on any WU using 0.0.13, it's when they get WU 13456 0.0.14 that they report missing .dll's, m...

Don't forget, my GTX 1080 cards fail with a popup error missing .dll's on 13456 core22 0.0.13 (all 10 cards) and my RTX 2080 cards run 13456 0.0.14 just fine (2 cards)

Here is a log from 1 of my GTX 1080 cards: 09:07:39:WU01:FS01:0x22:Checkpoint completed at step 2375000 09:09:35:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 2400000 out of 2500000 steps (96%) 09:11:32:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 2425000 out of 2500000 steps (97%) 09:13:29:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 2450000 out of 2500000 s...

I wonder if maybe updating the video drivers might add the .dll's? I say this because the 2 RTX 2080 cards don't get this error as they are using the latest drivers. Did some digging, all of my GTX 1080 cards is using core22 0.0.13, the RTX 2080 cards is using core22 0.0.14. I'm going to update the ...

I getting missing VC .dll messages when I get WU 13456 on my GTX 1080 cards, ALL of them (10 cards), I have 2 RTX 2080 cards that do fine.
This WU comes from WS 54.157.202.86.

And as soon as it's up, it's down again.
Here's a thought, How about a backup stat server to take over when main stat server goes down?

Here is the log from my 4P 09:35:56:WU00:FS00:Download 61.12% 09:38:52:WU00:FS00:Download 61.41% 09:41:17:WU00:FS00:Download 61.71% 09:43:06:WU00:FS00:Download 62.01% 09:46:01:WU00:FS00:Download 62.31% b[91m09:46:01:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Transfer failedb[0m 09:46:01:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171....

Every GPU WU has: regardless of the type of WU.

You've implied that a shortage of A5 WUs is equivalent to a shortage of projects for 64-cpu systems. That's not true. I did not mean there was a shortage of 64 core systems, just the A5 WU's to run on them. Right now, the only way to get A4 WU's is to make 4 16 core slots with V7, if I have 1 64 co...

Is A5 WU's a thing of the past now? Or are we going to see more? I have 2 quad socket servers with 4 Opteron 6276 16 core, for a total core count of 64 for each server. I don't need to have these sitting doing nothing like the others have said. So "if" A5's are gone, is there anything comi...

Ricky wrote:WhitehawkEQ,

If you go to 2 CPU:24 slots, you still can get work units. The benefit to science to science and the PPD would be better.

Look at that screen shot again, there are 8x8 core slots for a total core count of 64 I have changed that now to 4x16 core slots to see what that does.