Search found 18 matches

by Jonathan
Sun Jan 08, 2012 6:28 am
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Starting Point of Simulation?
Replies: 8
Views: 2150

Re: Starting Point of Simulation?

Thanks for your response, I don't think I was clear. I was asking how do they build the .pdb which tells the proteins information in 3D (X,Y,Z Coordinates) . Yes the primary structure is a straight line of aa's, but i was asking IF that is what they do to start off the simulation. As for you saying ...
by Jonathan
Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:46 am
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Starting Point of Simulation?
Replies: 8
Views: 2150

Starting Point of Simulation?

So you guys do not use xray-crystal as I understand from a previous post. What is the starting point of a protein? Is it in its primary structure.
by Jonathan
Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:43 am
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Guessing F@H GPU uses explicit solvent?
Replies: 2
Views: 2208

Guessing F@H GPU uses explicit solvent?

I have been playing around with 5-6 MD programs and I would have to say by far the best has been OpenMM Zephyr. Installation was extremely easy and even an idiot like me can work it!. Anyways, when I was playing around with that program with gpu acceleration, whenever I used implicit solvent my gpu ...
by Jonathan
Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:56 am
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Clarification for Copernicus
Replies: 11
Views: 3441

Re: Clarification for Copernicus

You got it right :)
by Jonathan
Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:21 am
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Clarification for Copernicus
Replies: 11
Views: 3441

Re: Clarification for Copernicus

Thanks for all the responses. Very interesting, even though I knew it, I am sure others learned something though, so not a waste. I am no expert (just a second year chem student) but from what I am looking up it seems to me I would need the native state, which is why I am interested in this. To Jess...
by Jonathan
Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:17 pm
Forum: The Science of FAH -- questions/answers
Topic: Clarification for Copernicus
Replies: 11
Views: 3441

Clarification for Copernicus

On the site (http://copernicus-computing.org/) it says "we observe structures 0.6Å from the native state within 30h" and "achieve sufficient sampling to predict the native state without a priori knowledge after 80-90h". Which type and how many processors did you guys use to get t...
by Jonathan
Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:41 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Be able to choose amount of threads run at start up
Replies: 5
Views: 581

Be able to choose amount of threads run at start up

I didn't know what section to put this in, so put it here.

Name says it all, when fah6.exe is run why not ask teh user to input the amount of threads to be used?

Would be much more efficient (for me at least) to do that rather than keep on editing the client.cfg file.
by Jonathan
Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:40 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Re: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

I'm not disputing the importance of hands on participation from people themselves, after all, if I didn't start using the unicore client myself, I wouldn't be here today. However, there are pros and cons to each of them, but just because we are given two choices does not mean we have to choose one o...
by Jonathan
Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:25 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Re: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

You bring up good points on ethics of using comparison, but I'll explain why sometimes putting all the facts and details of a subject is detrimental to what I plan to do. Let me explain. So I have a business and I donate money for building a $2100 PC with 4 GTX 560 Ti's and 1 i7-2600. My goal is to ...
by Jonathan
Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:42 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Re: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

Well, I would imagine it would be a quick coding fix, justnothing too complicated. Jut get the SMP client to run a single WU that is designated at the benchmark, and have a complete separate client just for the benchmarking. As for the waste of computations, limit the time frame of simulation so tha...
by Jonathan
Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:43 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Re: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

Hmmm, would be nice to have a "benchmark WU" that takes 5 minutes to finish and reports how many FLOPS the CPU/GPU is capable of. The reason I am so adamant about this is because I need to communicate with numbers (FLOPS) how effective a certain build is. The more FLOPS/$ the better. It is...
by Jonathan
Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:45 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: CPU x86 FLOPS = GPU x86 FLOPS?
Replies: 9
Views: 3525

Re: CPU x86 FLOPS = GPU x86 FLOPS?

I spent extra for the Antex 900 because of cooling, I thought i was generous because it is a $100 case :S As for the depth of the case, It would be a bad day for me if i set that up and found out the 4th gpu didn't fit, i hope they have exact spec for that as it will be a pita to figure out (as wher...
by Jonathan
Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:43 am
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Re: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

So could there be an estimate on how much x86 FLOPS there are for a GTX 460 Ti? Also how does f@h actually calculate FLOPS? Does it look for hardware IDs to figure out what CPU/GPU they are using and just add the numbers up from active clients, making it a best case scenario if those active clients ...
by Jonathan
Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:17 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?
Replies: 11
Views: 15739

Are my conversion for GPU flops relativly correct?

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_500_Series the GFLOPS of a 560 Ti is 1263.4. I'm assuming these are native FLOPS. and teh conversion from native FLOPS to x86 FLOPS for Nvidea GPUs is 1:2.11 (from http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=osstats ) so is it fair to say that ...
by Jonathan
Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:34 pm
Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
Topic: More people should be doing this...
Replies: 16
Views: 2704

Re: More people should be doing this...

Hell, I'd take a trip to Stanford!