Search found 125 matches

by Pette Broad
Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:35 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 10081 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
Replies: 2
Views: 333

Project: 10081 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

Exactly the same problem as I had with Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3) ie running slow , 0.7pph won't meet preferred deadline. Only the second one of this series I've had and both are not right. Will regard this as another bad WU.


Pete
by Pette Broad
Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:48 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
Replies: 2
Views: 281

Re: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

O.K, thanks, I may as well leave it to complete now as its at 95%.


Pete
by Pette Broad
Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:14 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
Replies: 2
Views: 281

Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

First one of these I've seen, got it using advmethods on 2.2ghz dual core Vista machine. Assuming the 25 point credit is correct then it's running at 0.7 pph and won't meet the initial 24 hour deadline. I can't see any problem with CPU usage and the other core is getting 7.0 pph :? After leaving it ...
by Pette Broad
Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:53 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: P10200
Replies: 5
Views: 969

P10200

Not sure what the problem is but I got this from 171.67.108.39. using -advmethods flag. I can't find it on the summary page and it's showing up as a p11289 worth 69 points using FahSpy :? Server 171.67.108.39 looks to be running O.K. [18:17:12] + Attempting to send results [February 12 18:17:12 UTC]...
by Pette Broad
Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:17 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
Replies: 2
Views: 600

Re: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)

Started getting that message today with the following unit and all others since: [19:44:59] Project: 10632 (Run 26, Clone 111, Gen 29) [19:44:59] + Attempting to send results [October 30 19:44:59 UTC] [19:44:59] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core [19:44:59] (Read 3256621 bytes from disk...
by Pette Broad
Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:20 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)
Replies: 2
Views: 600

171.67.108.20 Problem with unit (multiple)

This server has just started with the dreaded "Server reports Problem with unit" message, the last 4 units on different machines have all reported this. Usually means that the work is lost :( .

Edit.... 6 on the run now....machines off.


Pete
by Pette Broad
Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:50 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.39
Replies: 1
Views: 357

171.67.108.39

This server has been in standby for several days and I've got a few units to send in. Could someone look into this please.


Pete
by Pette Broad
Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:51 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 129.74.85.15
Replies: 2
Views: 386

Re: 129.74.85.15

Everything looks O.K from here. I had this same message on about 8 machines yesterday, made a change to the flags and got work right away...go figure.

Pete
by Pette Broad
Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:58 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 129.74.85.15
Replies: 2
Views: 386

129.74.85.15

Thought this had been resolved, obviously not. [21:34:47] + Attempting to send results [September 16 21:34:47 UTC] [21:37:04] + Results successfully sent [21:37:04] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home. [21:37:04] + Number of Units Completed: 1844 [21:37:13] - Preparing to get new work un...
by Pette Broad
Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:11 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Problem with unknown project??
Replies: 1
Views: 223

Problem with unknown project??

Someone on my team has reported that they sent in over a thousand WU's on the tenth of April, he usually sends in one or two per day. I've requested further info from him but after a quick look at O/C stat I can see that Team Ukraine are sending in 7,000 units a day, about 10x their normal output fo...
by Pette Broad
Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:11 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 169.230.26.30
Replies: 13
Views: 788

Re: 169.230.26.30

Looks like it was fixed and I got/sent some work. Didn't last for long though, its gone into reject mode again..


Pete
by Pette Broad
Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:20 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: No appropriate work server was available
Replies: 59
Views: 10087

Re: No appropriate work server was available

No work again. 15 or so CPU's idle.

Pete
by Pette Broad
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:25 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: No appropriate work server was available
Replies: 59
Views: 10087

Re: No appropriate work server was available

All machines picked up work overnight :)

Pete
by Pette Broad
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:41 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
Replies: 16
Views: 1871

Re: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole

Hadn't checked my PPD for a week, but I can see a 30k PPD drop off since the 5th. I have 5 machines running these so it would seem that at 6k per day per machine that we're not getting credit. Can't be 100% certain as there's no longer any way of checking the number of WU's on each project. Pete Do...
by Pette Broad
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:35 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole
Replies: 16
Views: 1871

Re: 171.64.65.61 is a Black Hole

bruce wrote: It looks like they were credited less than half hour ago. (It's 22:14 PST now)
Yes, mine have just been credited :) , thanks,

Pete