Folding Forum

I have undervolted it a bit to help with power draw and heat but it isn't overclocked beyond what it normally boosts to. In fact, the maximum clock is even lower than what it boosts to. I don't suppose it is the culprit?

It failed again. 09:59:30:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 6250000 out of 6250000 steps (100%) 09:59:31:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt 09:59:31:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result file checkpointState.xml 09:59:31:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result file checkpt.crc 09:59:31:WU02:FS00:0x21:Saving result...

First few lines of the log file containing config *********************** Log Started 2017-07-08T16:47:06Z *********************** 16:47:06:************************* Folding@home Client ************************* 16:47:06: Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/ 16:47:06: Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanf...

Now, the other WU from Project 9414 which has a collection server and ran completely fine without errors failed after upload. "Server did not like results, dumping" 07:02:44:WU03:FS00:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt 07:02:44:WU03:FS00:0x21:Saving result file checkpointState.xml 07:0...

For whatever reason, Server 171.67.108.157 is off-line at the moment. (Maybe as a result of yesterday's power outage at Stanford.) Normally, your client will try both a Work Server and a Collection server. I don't see enough of your log to know what happened when it tried the other one. That partic...

15:42:04:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9414 run:464 clone:0 gen:286 core:0x21 unit:0x00000152ab436c9d585e06936a4fa890 15:42:04:WU01:FS01:Uploading 7.76MiB to 171.67.108.157 15:42:04:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.157:8080 15:49:05:WU01:FS01:Upload 1.61%...

Alright. I've updated the drivers to the latest 384.76 and it seems like the app is reporting correct PPD. It was also getting the correct amount of points before (verified via Stanford website and folding.extremeoverclocking.com), and it is just the client was reporting incorrectly which is about h...

You run a old driver. I use 378.78 on win 10. I was using 382.XX driver before and downgraded to 373.06 after seeing that it is the recommended driver for folding for now. Not sure what's the problem here though. That is an old recommendation, look at the dates of the posts and the reasons it was r...

I suspect the 1060 is being bottlenecked by the PCIe bus speed. If you want to see if your 1070 is running at full speed pause the 1060 and let the 1070 run for a day or so by itself. At full speed you should get around 600k PPD - given yours is power limited you should see 450-500k from that card ...

foldy wrote:Are you sure both cards are under load? Maybe fah tries to run both work units on the same GPU?

It is indeed running on both devices as shown by GPU-z workloads.

Kjetil wrote:You run a old driver. I use 378.78 on win 10.

I was using 382.XX driver before and downgraded to 373.06 after seeing that it is the recommended driver for folding for now. Not sure what's the problem here though.

I'm not sure I'll be able to answer the question, but facts that also might be helpful is the effective speed of the PCIe bus (Reported by GPU-Z) for each card. (Just because your hardware specification says it supports x16 3.0 and x4 2.0 speeds doesn't prove they're actually connecting at that spe...

I've just started folding on my GTX 1070 and GTX 1060 6GB on Windows 10 recently. I have been folding 24/7 for 2 days and have already completed 30 WUs after binding my passkey. But my PPD values for both cards combined are hovering around 450,000 when I should be getting at least 650,000 to 750,000...