Folding Forum

With Windows 10 I was seeing 2.8-3.5m PPD on a 2080Ti on a 9 year old motherboard with PCIe 2.0 x16 and a Core i5 650 if that helps.

Well within expectations of what the card is capable of.

Just to add my voice back into the conversation, after the credit of missing points yesterday I went straight back to the previous issue, so whilst the manual credit worked it appears that the auto-submission is still faulty. The server simply doesn't seem to be accepting submissions at all now, mul...

+1

Many thanks for the swift fix.

I think I've fallen into the same hole. I have been happily averaging 16-18 million ppd for quite a while and haven't changed anything in terms of cards or settings in the past few days, but popped over to EOC a short while ago and saw: https://i.imgur.com/Yl7eGVf.png Yesterday's output looks to be ...

Cheers, hopefully it'll be back in New and improved form before long!

I've got no real issue with 13422, which fortuitously I seem to have gone back to on most of my cards since I posted the OP. I just thought it might benefit John to see my findings in case it's a wider issue.

Just an observation, the PPD on these units seems to be wildly lower then I would expect, around half of normal output. Currently running the following units: GTX 1080Ti - P13424(R147,C32,G0) - 730,000 ppd - 3:05 tpf RTX 2060 - P13424(R30,C27,G1) - 730,000 ppd - 3.05 tpf RTX 2070 - P13424(R120,C5,G1...

I too have noticed this behaviour across a mix of high-end Nvidia cards (species 7 & 8). I seem to be getting these WUs on the majority of my cards, and it's shaved over 4 million points off my daily average. As long as science is getting done I can cope with that for a while, but it'd be nice t...

Just to be clear, I believe Neil-B has nailed it with the passkey suggestion above, those look like non-QRB figures. However, just one thing to bear in mind regarding laptops is that many models will share a heatsink between the CPU and GPU, with only higher end models generally offering truly disti...

From what I have seen on the Nvidia side, the RTX 2060 Super (maybe the non-super too) and up can all consistently do over 1M PPD. The 2080 Ti can actually exceed 3M PPD on some projects. Spot on, on Core22 jobs it's unusual to see the base 2060 lower than 1M, the one in my collection is sitting at...

If it helps, from my testing on 1000s of work units across multiple high-end Nvidia cards (both CORE21 and CORE22), I'd say that the ascending order of PPD is:

RTX 2060
GTX 1080Ti
RTX 2070
Titan X (Pascal)
RTX 2070 Super/RTX 2080
Titan XP/RTX 2080 Super
RTX 2080Ti

It's a good card. I still believe the sweet spot is the 2070 Super, if you can find one under £400 then it's a card that will brush 2 million on the right core22 WUs.

Many thanks toTow.

@foldy, I don't disagree that the 2080Ti is in the lead by some margin, but high end cards from both this and the previous generation can all turn in the most complex work units very quickly and see a notable increase in output when running them.

I've just noticed an issue with my Titan X machine, in that it's showing as a species 6 GPU in GPUS.txt, where it should definitely be a species 8: 0x10de:0x1b00:2:6:GP102 [TITAN X] 6144 Here is the GPU-z sccreenshot: https://i.imgur.com/dQ0qT6O.png This card is a fair bit more potent than the 1080T...

I would have thought that the assignment servers would be able to detect when a work server is down and cease pointing clients to it until the ping is re-established. Apparently that is not the case. Or if it is, then for some reason 65.254.110.245 thinks that 140.163.4.231 is still alive - when it ...