Folding Forum

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... l#biontech

I've been wondering the same thing. It would be interesting to see where one or more compounds feed into any of the efforts found on either of these roadmaps: Vaccines Map: https://www.racap.com/media/Covid-19/CO ... 2020_F.pdf Therapeutics Map: https://www.racap.com/media/Covid-19/CO ... 2020_F.pdf...

Here is my history with the 134XX projects, on Windows 10 with a RTX 2060: Project Total run Total anomalous Percent anomalous 13412 3 0 0% 13414 37 4 11% 13416 15 5 33% 13418 9 0 0% 13420 20 1 5% 'Anomalous' defined as a step function longer to complete. Nominal is 4 hours, plus or minus a few minu...

I also just had a long running one, taking 12.5 hours (normally taking 4 hours). It was run:1291 clone:121 gen:0. Just wanted to confirm, did I see in one of the posts from @JohnChodera that as long as the job results get successfully returned, we don't need to post abnormally long run times on the ...

Running summary for processing times on project 13414 (on a RTX 2060). Updates: Had three on 6/26, all in the 4 hr range. With five in a row processed as expected, will just report anomalous ones going forward (unless I hear otherwise of course). 06/20/20 run:949 clone:21 gen:0 (unit: 0x0000000012bc...

Running summary for processing times on project 13414 (on a RTX 2060). Updates: Added the completed time for yesterday's long running unit (6/24), and two for today, both in the 4 hr range. 06/20/20 run:949 clone:21 gen:0 (unit: 0x0000000012bc7d9a5eed8c559f6fc8c8) time 04:08:42 06/21/20 run:824 clon...

A running summary of my processing times on project 13414 (on a RTX 2060): 06/20/20 run:949 clone:21 gen:0 (unit: 0x0000000012bc7d9a5eed8c559f6fc8c8) time 04:08:42 (hh:mm:ss) 06/21/20 run:824 clone:39 gen:1 (unit: 0x0000000112bc7d9a5eed8c58bbe879cb) time 13:14:51 06/22/20 run:255 clone:83 gen:0 (uni...

And a couple more today (RTX 2060), first looks as expected, second looks slow. And didn't mention in previous posts, running 24/7.

From earlier today: 13414 (Run 1816, Clone 4, Gen 1), TPF at 2 min 10 sec
Currently running: 13414 (Run 1553, Clone 12, Gen 0), TPF at 7 min, 18 sec

Regards,
Curt

Thanks John. Picked up another 13414 this morning (Run 255, Clone 83, Gen 0). The estimated time between frames is 2 min 18 sec, so looks to be in the 4 hour range also.

Cheers,

Project: 13412 (Run 2439, Clone 10, Gen 0) was processed a little bit later last night, with a run time a hair over 4 hrs.

Cheers,

Following up on a post from this morning that I may not have put in the right forum (leave it to a new guy :D ). viewtopic.php?f=74&t=35624&start=15#p338142 (includes log extracts) The final processing time on Project: 13414 (Run 824, Clone 39, Gen 1) was a little over 13 hours (RTX 2060). N...

Good idea. Thanks!

Another data point on processing a Project 13414 WU (ongoing). With the RTX 2060, WU's have been taking roughly 2-4 hours (1.0-1.1M PPD). This one looks like it will take somewhat longer. There's plenty of RAM available and I only have 8 of the 16 CPU cores working on Rosetta WU's, with the remainin...

I found this helpful.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... Ek/pubhtml

Hi sekramer10, I would offer up one newb's experience/perspective. I discovered Rosetta@home about the same time as Folding@home and have ended up supporting both. I have my GPU working on FaH WU's and a percentage of my CPU cores supporting Rosetta. Before the ability to select a COVID-19 preferenc...