Folding Forum

I upgraded to 7.5.1 and I still see the same issue.

Oh, I just noticed that you said the original problem was fixed. Are you sure about that? When I click on the link in the FAHControl client, I still go to this link (https://stats.foldingathome.org/donor/S ... liot_Dewey) and it still gives me a 0 rank. Do I need to update my client to get a differe...

Yes I'm assuming that. I could be wrong. I'm more certain about the other things I mentioned.

Just a ping on this. Also I found an additional error. If you go to this page (https://stats.foldingathome.org/team/165) it says there are 7 active CPUs within 50 days. However the second user alone has 15 active CPUs within 50 days, and the third has 2. Also there are a bunch of N/As for Rank, for ...

Sorry I wasn't sure exactly where to put this post. At least for FAHControl from Mac, the stats links I get from clicking on my username are broken now. I'm almost positive this used to work. Here's the link that's broken, note that it gives me a rank of 0: https://stats.foldingathome.org/donor/S .....

Haha that is funny.

I saw one of the papers posted on the news section of the site, discussing the potential for deep learning in drug discovery: http://folding.stanford.edu/2017/07/10/ ... or-pharma/ I was a little surprised by this because I thought that F@H basically did statistical modeling, not machine learning or...

I'm not a scientist so this is just out of curiosity, but how do FaH projects get setup on the backend? Do they just use MSM Builder to setup a project, email it to Stanford, and ask for time on the system? (It seems like there is a market for contributions now, i.e. it's not just Stanford researche...

I found 2-4 more bugs on the new stat pages. I'm pretty sure about the first two. Old Team Page: http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/mai ... eamnum=165 New Team Page: http://folding.stanford.edu/stats/team/165 1-2. The old system has correct client count and rank on the Team page, the new one seems ...

Thanks for the explanation, that's probably what happened.

Still see the same off numbers as in my previous comment. Maybe it's just me though, or the fix hasn't been deployed yet.

The rank seems correct now, but the aggregates shown seem wrong. If I look at my ranking for October I have rank 4,338 with 204 WU's and 331,451 credit. That seems fine, but if I go back to September I only have 2 WU's and 3,301 credit, yet my ranking is still 4,330. If I had to guess the aggregates...

I like the concept of the monthly leaderboard. However, as a donor one can't see one's own rank for a month (unless one is in the top 100, of course). I assume that was the intent based on the wording from the announcement, "Our intent was to give new donors a way to more directly see their con...

The contributions of the CPU's are <1% of the contributions of the GPU's though. According to this: http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/mai ... e=osstats2 I am going to keep folding regardless, but part of me wonders - if not for the community element which is important - isn't it just a small drop ...

I am curious if, for purposes of FaH, CPU's are just poor man's GPU's (far lower FLOPS) or if there are certain projects that can't be done on GPU and actually require CPU. No particular reason I'm asking, just a bit curious.