Folding Forum

It looks like we're setting up to do drug screening for the viral protease on CPUs -- stay tuned!

Please use the 11737 project feedback thread: viewtopic.php?f=74&t=32073

Please use the 11737 project feedback thread: viewtopic.php?f=74&t=32073

Another new CORE22 science coming to ADVANCED! 11739: # atoms: 67590 (average, number of atoms varies between RUNs due to different protein sequences, hence PPD will vary) credit: 11110 k-factor: 0.75 timeout: 5.8d deadline: 8.2d precision: mixed This is an exploratory project for advancing Folding@...

New CORE22 science coming to ADVANCED! This is a very large system -- 287229 atoms -- which might bring a particular set of challenges. 11738: # atoms: 287229 credit: 29389 k-factor: 0.75 timeout: 5.8d deadline: 8.2d precision: mixed The PRC2 complex is a therapeutic target for a number of cancers, ...

Please use the existing advanced thread for feedback: viewtopic.php?f=74&t=32073

Thanks all!

For the first time, presenting core22 to the full F@h! Failure rate in ADVANCED was slightly lower than what we see with core21, so this hopefully should be a smooth testing. I will be releasing small batches of test WUs and analyzing failures live, before I open it up full time. The deadline and cr...

Is it still necessary to set the beta flag for core 22? You set flag to advanced? It's working right now because 11737 is in advanced -- I might turn it off anytime without notice so don't blame me if you suddenly stop getting work, my advice is to run beta flag only as I will ensure there's always...

Currently seeing only a 3% failure rate in the second batch, so I'm leaving the ADVANCED flag on constantly now.

Currently seeing only a 3% failure rate in the second batch, so I'm leaving the ADVANCED flag on constantly now.

6% failure rate in the first batch -- not great, not too bad -- (cf. core21 failure rate on full F@h is ~5%) -- I call this good enough to start a second batch of about 500 WUs - distributing now. Very interestingly, 8/9 failures seen in the first batch were due to the same error - `clWaitForEvents`...

6% failure rate in the first batch -- not great, not too bad -- (cf. core21 failure rate on full F@h is ~5%) -- I call this good enough to start a second batch of about 500 WUs - distributing now. Very interestingly, 8/9 failures seen in the first batch were due to the same error - `clWaitForEvents`...

This has a fantastic 'conspiracy by the Researchers' tone to it and I am very thankful to JimboPalmer for the chance to enjoy this piece of writing. xD Seriously though, I thought people would be annoyed at how long it took for core22 to get out rather than be annoyed about having a new core. I have...

Nearly 150 WUs were released to advanced, stopping for now until I see results of those.