mac mini bet

Please confine these topics to things that would be of general interest to those who are interested in FAH which don't fall into any other category.

Moderator: Site Moderators

Post Reply
divery4eyes
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:10 pm
Hardware configuration: E2180 @1.08, 2Gb ddr2, 500Gb hd, Last XP, 8800 GT 1835 shader
AMD Athlon x2 2200, 2GB DDR2, ?? GB HD, Last XP, GT 240 1600 shader
Location: off of I40 in Arkansas

mac mini bet

Post by divery4eyes »

Ok guys, I have a question.
A couple of weeks ago I made a bet with this guy. Dude kept telling me how fast his Mac mini is.
Every sentence was,
My mac this, my Mac that. Your pc sucks ha ha ha :lol:
My mac doesnt get virus infections<-so what, i've never had a problem with WinXP
My mac is fast, your pc is so slow :lol:

What processor and video combo should I use?
This will be done right around tax time so im thinking of a budget around $800-1000

:lol:
ohhhhhhhhh almost forget about the best part.
He bet me $400

No joking
Ded serious
I am not playing

Now I was thinking that I would build a small monster of a system and when I win the bet,
dedicate it to folding 8-)
over 30,000 werk units
"Everyone is in the same boat. Grab an oar, and paddle some WU's." -RAH

Still GPU folding with 8.2 teraflops
Brazos
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:02 pm

Re: mac mini bet

Post by Brazos »

What's benchmark will you be using for the comparison?
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: mac mini bet

Post by Grandpa_01 »

And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus. And quite frankley MAC's are just over priced yuppie toys. The mini is only 2.53GHz Cor 2 duo just build around the Q9550 you can build a machine that will kick it's but for less than what a mini cost. As far as graphics go just about any graphics card will beat the mini it has on board graphics.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819115041
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
chrisretusn
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:12 am
Hardware configuration: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Location: Philippines

Re: mac mini bet

Post by chrisretusn »

Grandpa_01 wrote:And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus.
Yet. :wink: :wink:
Image
Folding on Slackware Linux.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: mac mini bet

Post by Grandpa_01 »

chrisretusn wrote:
Grandpa_01 wrote:And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus.
Yet. :wink: :wink:
They have been trying for a very long time and to date 0 have worked that is more than Mac can say :wink:
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: mac mini bet

Post by P5-133XL »

Grandpa_01 wrote:And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus.
I doubt that matters, The Windows/Linux x64 choices run 32 bit code just fine.
Image
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: mac mini bet

Post by Grandpa_01 »

P5-133XL wrote:
Grandpa_01 wrote:And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus.
I doubt that matters, The Windows/Linux x64 choices run 32 bit code just fine.
Just curious but what does that have to do with 64bit OS and viruses.

No more rootkits?
There’s more good news: the current rootkits that have been written for 32 bit systems, including the infamous Sony music CD rootkit, don’t work in the 64 bit OS. That’s because when updating the kernel code for the 64 bit version, Microsoft programmers took the opportunity to include a “patch guard” – code that is part of the kernel makes it impossible to install a patch in a running kernel (which kernel mode rootkits do on 32 bit systems).

Likewise, processor vendors had an opportunity, in making the new 64 bit processors, to include security mechanisms. Both AMD and Intel include code in their 64 bit products to prevent the exploitation of buffer overflow and buffer underrun conditions.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: mac mini bet

Post by P5-133XL »

Grandpa_01 wrote:
P5-133XL wrote:
Grandpa_01 wrote:And by the way go with a 64bit OS there is no such thing as a 64bit virus.
I doubt that matters, The Windows/Linux x64 choices run 32 bit code just fine.
Just curious but what does that have to do with 64bit OS and viruses.

No more rootkits?
There’s more good news: the current rootkits that have been written for 32 bit systems, including the infamous Sony music CD rootkit, don’t work in the 64 bit OS. That’s because when updating the kernel code for the 64 bit version, Microsoft programmers took the opportunity to include a “patch guard” – code that is part of the kernel makes it impossible to install a patch in a running kernel (which kernel mode rootkits do on 32 bit systems).

Likewise, processor vendors had an opportunity, in making the new 64 bit processors, to include security mechanisms. Both AMD and Intel include code in their 64 bit products to prevent the exploitation of buffer overflow and buffer underrun conditions.
Since you don't seem to know: Viruses are not necessarily rootkits. As long as 32 bit code runs fine under a 64 bit OS, then lots of the old malware will still operate in a 64 bit OS. I wouldn't operate my 64 bit OS with no anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewalls, phishing filters because it is so safe that it doesn't need protection just because it is 64 bit.

64 bit OS's are not a magic bullet that prevents all malware. Microsoft is still releasing security patches every Tuesday. The AV market has not dried up and there are still security firms producing AV products for 64 bit software.

The security measures being used to protect x64 CPU's still apply to the same CPU's operating in an x32 environment. The security measures being used in the x64 OS's are the same as the security measures protecting users in the x32 environment (for the same OS at the same level of service pack). i.e. the security measures protecting x64 Win 7 are the same as the measures being used to protect the x32 Win 7 but Win XP protections will be different than Win 7 but it has nothing to do with x64 vs x32.

A person does not need an x64 OS to be protected from malware!
Image
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: mac mini bet

Post by Grandpa_01 »

While some 32bit spyware,and ineffective viruses may be able to run on the 32bit side of the OS they can not affect the 64bit. The only viruses ever found were back in 2004 and 2005 by Norton and guess what they were never confirmed by anybody. What a sales tool for AV companies. There is no such thing as a 64bit virus at this time. Do I say their will never be no I do not but at this time that 64bit system is a pretty good silver bullet.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Post Reply