Computing moves forward! [URL]

Please confine these topics to things that would be of general interest to those who are interested in FAH which don't fall into any other category.

Moderator: Site Moderators

Post Reply
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by PantherX »

Yep, F@H just crossed 40 PetaFLOPS (viewtopic.php?f=16&t=26054) making it faster than the fastest Supercomputer :)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by bruce »

Adam A. Wanderer wrote:Yes, but F@H seems to work only on a single type of problem, whereas a supercomputer can be reprogramed to work on several different types of problems.
And conversely, the Chinese computer wouldn't do a very good job running FAH without a lot of software changes -- though it woud be interesting to try it.

It's iteresting that the article mentions Hadoop and not FAH. They're both specialized alternatives to "standard" supercomputers (if there is such a thing).
ChristianVirtual
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by ChristianVirtual »

As per here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOP500
Lots of intel and Linux, should be relative easy to fold on some CPU-slots ... I would offer my passkey ... :roll:
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by VijayPande »

Google has given us access to pretty dramatic resources. We can't publicly comment just how much, but it's definitely big. There's a reason they call it "Exacycle."
https://folding.stanford.edu/home/key-n ... chemistry/
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by VijayPande »

PS I should mention that the Google resources don't show up on the FAH osstats page.
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
NookieBandit
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:17 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD Opteron 2 x 6274 (32 Cores)
AMD FX-8350 (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4790K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4790K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4771K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770S (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3930K (12 Cores)
Nvidia GPUs:
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780
GTX 690
GTX 690
AMD GPUs:
HD 7970 GBE
HD 7970 GBE
HD 7990
HD 7990
HD 7990
R9 295X2
R9 295X2
R9 295X2
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by NookieBandit »

Dr. Pande, if the Google contributions were included, what would be your estimate for the additional PetaFLOPS Google contributes above the 40 PetaFlOPS recently achieved? I always appreciate it when you weigh in on topics on the forum. Thank you for taking the time.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by bruce »

NookieBandit wrote:Dr. Pande, if the Google contributions were included, what would be your estimate for the additional PetaFLOPS Google contributes above the 40 PetaFlOPS recently achieved? I always appreciate it when you weigh in on topics on the forum. Thank you for taking the time.
Sorry, but he already said can't answer your question.
VijayPande wrote:Google has given us access to pretty dramatic resources. We can't publicly comment just how much, but it's definitely big. There's a reason they call it "Exacycle."
If he can't disclose X, then it doesn't make sense for him to be able to disclose (40+X).
NookieBandit
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:17 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD Opteron 2 x 6274 (32 Cores)
AMD FX-8350 (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4790K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4790K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-4771K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770K (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3770S (8 Cores)
Intel i7-3930K (12 Cores)
Nvidia GPUs:
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780ti
GTX 780
GTX 690
GTX 690
AMD GPUs:
HD 7970 GBE
HD 7970 GBE
HD 7990
HD 7990
HD 7990
R9 295X2
R9 295X2
R9 295X2
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by NookieBandit »

Actually, Bruce, I think you're trying to be helpful but, first, my question was to Dr. Pande, and second, your answer did not address my question.

The question to Dr. Pande specifically referenced the increase in incremental aggregated power contributed, not categorized by osstats. His "p.s." clarified his position relative to a restriction on any public announcement that such osstat breakdown would not be forthcoming. However, his clarification did not suggest commenting on an incremental aggregated PetaFLOP power increase was confidential/proprietary information.

If Dr. Pande chooses not to answer, that's his decision. The question can hang out there unanswered forever, which in itself is the answer.
Jesse_V
Site Moderator
Posts: 2851
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4
Location: Western Washington

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by Jesse_V »

It's entirely possible that Google could be collaborating in such a way that they've got their own assignment/work servers which are not hooked up to the stats system. This would be relatively simple to implement logistically and would keep things isolated and protected, which is likely favorable to Google's sysadmins and security crew.
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
Jesse_V
Site Moderator
Posts: 2851
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4
Location: Western Washington

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by Jesse_V »

I should also mention that this is not the first time that they have collaborated with Google. In the early years of F@h, Google co-founder Sergey Brin launched an add-on for the Google Toolbar called Google Compute, which according to one source tripled the number of machines running F@h. Google Compute ended in late 2005, but I am excited to see them Google contributing again nine years later. :)
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
ChristianVirtual
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by ChristianVirtual »

In that (commercial) context I also see the NaCl version ... At least partially. Still good to have for part-time folder and as easy "entry drug"
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
CygnusXI
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 4:41 am

Re: Computing moves forward! [URL]

Post by CygnusXI »

Thanks Google! First they bring us chrome , gmail, etc, then more processing power for F@H. Google has no end to how cool it is. "Exacycle" Cool name too. Why the exa? Is it capable of many Exaflops :shock: Coming from Google I would not really be that surprised. Plus, why name it Exacycle if its only a PetaCycle? Google did just buy Motorola recently, which is one of the largest IC producing companies on earth....

"Scratches head in wonder"
Image
Post Reply