Designer Proteins

Please confine these topics to things that would be of general interest to those who are interested in FAH which don't fall into any other category.

Moderator: Site Moderators

Designer Proteins

Postby rbpeake » Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:52 am

Interesting article.

Scientists Are Designing Artisanal Proteins for Your Body https://nyti.ms/2DTx71O
rbpeake
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: NYC Metro Area

Re: Designer Proteins

Postby Nert » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:57 am

Agree ... very interesting. Results from Rosetta at home (not FAH) I believe.
Nert
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:46 pm

Re: Designer Proteins

Postby foldy » Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:31 am

So is the puzzle solved already? Or only at the surface?
foldy
 
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm

Re: Designer Proteins

Postby tcphillips » Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:39 pm

Good article, and informative....

...so then, to play not-too-serious "straight guy," if this particular problem is "solved," are we (F@H) old news?....is our work still relevant? Why are we still doing what we're doing...?
(...not that I'm going to quit anytime soon...)

--T
Image

1 x Q6750 - stock 2 x GTX 950 Ti
1 x Q6600 - stock GTX 1070 Ti
1 x e3550 - stock 2 x GTX 750 Ti

~740,000 PPD when the wind is out of the SSW @ 7kts
tcphillips
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:54 pm
Location: Romeo, MIchigan

Re: Designer Proteins

Postby Joe_H » Thu Dec 28, 2017 5:29 pm

From my understanding, Rosetta just gets the researchers a folded state and does not necessarily identify the mechanisms through which a protein reaches that state. It will not also find many of the possible mis-folded states a protein might fall into. These are things that F@H does determine.

So I would say that a portion of the puzzle is solved, but it is going to take more research to see what the details and consequences are connected to a particular protein design. Those are such things as what happens if/when the designed protein mis-folds, and how do possible mutations effect that as well.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Joe_H
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4151
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: W. MA


Return to Scientific discussions (Non-FAH)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron