So the surge of newbies, caused rationing of WU's; newbies to Wu's would graph over time, show quite well or easy to plot.
Where are we now, catching up, peaked, or back to normal? You would think the F@H's brass, would make a statement vividly. Shows donor respect! What happens is 2nd hand or 3rd hand, be patient continue spending, eventually it will get better!
Donors efforts are taken for granted, donors not complimented, & not mentioned in the footnotes on papers page.
Everyone who contributes to the "PAPERS" is acknowledged (including police dept's, animal control etc. who helped in the project), F@H mostly in its "PAPERS" does not acknowledge in the footnotes Donors.
Why because F@H's arrogance believes donors are expendable (screw him/her another will replace) attitude. Arrogance by the masters, that they depend on, that's F@H.
F@H's arrogance would have you believe, do to size they contribute more to science. Not TRUE! Results however you want to judge: "papers or adapted OR contributed to drug creation / by flops" Top dog flops, is not has great as they, portray to newbies folders. Or more/equal bang for your bucks.
UPdate
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Re: UPdate
How many of these threads are you going to make asking these same questions? What kind of reaction are you trying to get out of other donors?
No such thing as rationing of WU. They added over 20 servers but you should already know this the link is right up there in the open.
OS Stats FLOPS (which is shared openly) still growing so then what is normal? Points per day is still going up. You can't predict the future demand for WU especially with summer coming up. So how are you going to answer if it is"Catching up"? It is not a question that can be answered yes or no. How many more statements/interviews do "F@H's brass" need to make? I would link to interviews but you already said in the other question thread you won't go to links.
Every time someone asks "what is F@H" in the answer donors are mentioned. So how are they not mentioned? Then the question becomes why do you need your specific name in F@H papers?
How long do you think it takes to write a paper? IF points = science are they going to have more papers this month than all of last year. Papers are a lagging factor that is going to take months of lab work and talking to peers about findings.
No such thing as rationing of WU. They added over 20 servers but you should already know this the link is right up there in the open.
OS Stats FLOPS (which is shared openly) still growing so then what is normal? Points per day is still going up. You can't predict the future demand for WU especially with summer coming up. So how are you going to answer if it is"Catching up"? It is not a question that can be answered yes or no. How many more statements/interviews do "F@H's brass" need to make? I would link to interviews but you already said in the other question thread you won't go to links.
Every time someone asks "what is F@H" in the answer donors are mentioned. So how are they not mentioned? Then the question becomes why do you need your specific name in F@H papers?
How long do you think it takes to write a paper? IF points = science are they going to have more papers this month than all of last year. Papers are a lagging factor that is going to take months of lab work and talking to peers about findings.