Were they running F@H?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team


Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby zexmaxwell » Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:46 am

that is Summit, IBM's supercomputer. It is a different project. One of the F@H researcher did talk about it during the AMA
My room is always Hot.
User avatar
zexmaxwell
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:20 pm

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Jesse_V » Sun Mar 22, 2020 1:14 am

Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
Jesse_V
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 2846
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:44 am
Location: Western Washington

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Jonazz » Sun Mar 22, 2020 3:36 am

Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.


Things can get really interesting when we reach a few exaflops. Imagine the science that can be done!
Jonazz
 
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:08 pm

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Azmodes » Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:41 am

Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.

Just curious, how do you get those numbers from the stats? Can't find anything about FLOPS or number of processors anywhere.
Azmodes
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:38 am
Location: Gradec, Austria

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby uyaem » Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:50 am

It's on the last tab (OS): https://stats.foldingathome.org/os
Image
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900X (1x21 CPUs) ~ GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Asus)
uyaem
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:35 pm
Location: Esslingen, Germany

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Azmodes » Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:54 am

ah, thanks. Unfortunately that tab does not seem to load for me. I only see the description, but no results.
Azmodes
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:38 am
Location: Gradec, Austria

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby uyaem » Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:00 am

Screenshot from a few minutes ago:

Image
uyaem
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:35 pm
Location: Esslingen, Germany

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Azmodes » Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:22 am

Cheers!

Almost a billion billion FLOPS. Amazing.
Azmodes
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:38 am
Location: Gradec, Austria

Re: Were they running F@H?

Postby Neil-B » Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:37 pm

… and three days later current Total showing 767,977 TFLOPS and 1,554,728 x86 TFLOPS
1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.13
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.13
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro, GTX 750Ti 2GB, FAH 7.6.13
Neil-B
 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:52 pm
Location: UK


Return to The Science of FAH -- questions/answers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron