Page 1 of 1

Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 10:39 pm
by mikeestacio

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:46 pm
by zexmaxwell
that is Summit, IBM's supercomputer. It is a different project. One of the F@H researcher did talk about it during the AMA

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:14 am
by Jesse_V
Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:36 am
by Jonazz
Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
Things can get really interesting when we reach a few exaflops. Imagine the science that can be done!

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:41 am
by Azmodes
Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org

We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
Just curious, how do you get those numbers from the stats? Can't find anything about FLOPS or number of processors anywhere.

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:50 am
by uyaem
It's on the last tab (OS): https://stats.foldingathome.org/os

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:54 am
by Azmodes
ah, thanks. Unfortunately that tab does not seem to load for me. I only see the description, but no results.

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:00 am
by uyaem
Screenshot from a few minutes ago:

Image

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:22 am
by Azmodes
Cheers!

Almost a billion billion FLOPS. Amazing.

Re: Were they running F@H?

Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:37 pm
by Neil-B
… and three days later current Total showing 767,977 TFLOPS and 1,554,728 x86 TFLOPS