shortage of small smp wu's?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
DemonfangArun
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:23 pm
Contact:

shortage of small smp wu's?

Post by DemonfangArun »

i feel like i posted about this before, but cannot find anything in my post history about it >.> -shrugs-

anyway, i have a couple machines that have 2 threads, and are unable to get wus when set to smp:2. i could use nacl but i'd like to save that for last resort since it requires more tending than using v7 (which is more or less set-and-forget).

system: (yes, i know it's not the fastest thing in the world, but it's better than nothing :ewink:

Code: Select all

21:29:17:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
21:29:17:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
21:29:17:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
21:29:17:       Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
21:29:17:         Args: 
21:29:17:       Config: C:/Users/Demonfang Arun/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/config.xml
21:29:17:******************************** Build ********************************
21:29:17:      Version: 7.4.4
21:29:17:         Date: Mar 4 2014
21:29:17:         Time: 20:26:54
21:29:17:      SVN Rev: 4130
21:29:17:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
21:29:17:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
21:29:17:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
21:29:17:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp /Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
21:29:17:     Platform: win32 XP
21:29:17:         Bits: 32
21:29:17:         Mode: Release
21:29:17:******************************* System ********************************
21:29:17:          CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU 2127U @ 1.90GHz
21:29:17:       CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9
21:29:17:         CPUs: 2
21:29:17:       Memory: 3.88GiB
21:29:17:  Free Memory: 2.54GiB
21:29:17:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
21:29:17:   OS Version: 6.1
21:29:17:  Has Battery: true
21:29:17:   On Battery: true
21:29:17:   UTC Offset: -4
21:29:17:          PID: 1924
21:29:17:          CWD: C:/Windows/system32
21:29:17:           OS: Windows 7 Professional
21:29:17:      OS Arch: AMD64
21:29:17:         GPUs: 0
21:29:17:         CUDA: Not detected
21:29:17:Win32 Service: true
21:29:17:***********************************************************************
log:

Code: Select all

00:52:35:Saving configuration to config.xml
00:52:35:<config>
00:52:35:  <!-- HTTP Server -->
00:52:35:  <allow v='10.0.0.10'/>
00:52:35:
00:52:35:  <!-- Network -->
00:52:35:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
00:52:35:
00:52:35:  <!-- Remote Command Server -->
00:52:35:  <password v='********'/>
00:52:35:
00:52:35:  <!-- Slot Control -->
00:52:35:  <power v='full'/>
00:52:35:
00:52:35:  <!-- User Information -->
00:52:35:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
00:52:35:  <team v='194826'/>
00:52:35:  <user v='Kinata'/>
00:52:35:
00:52:35:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
00:52:35:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
00:52:35:    <cpus v='2'/>
00:52:35:  </slot>
00:52:35:</config>
00:52:37:Removing old file 'configs/config-20150408-214432.xml'
00:52:37:Saving configuration to config.xml
00:52:37:<config>
00:52:37:  <!-- HTTP Server -->
00:52:37:  <allow v='10.0.0.10'/>
00:52:37:
00:52:37:  <!-- Network -->
00:52:37:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
00:52:37:
00:52:37:  <!-- Remote Command Server -->
00:52:37:  <password v='********'/>
00:52:37:
00:52:37:  <!-- Slot Control -->
00:52:37:  <power v='full'/>
00:52:37:
00:52:37:  <!-- User Information -->
00:52:37:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
00:52:37:  <team v='194826'/>
00:52:37:  <user v='Kinata'/>
00:52:37:
00:52:37:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
00:52:37:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
00:52:37:    <cpus v='2'/>
00:52:37:  </slot>
00:52:37:</config>
00:53:08:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
00:53:29:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get ID from '171.67.108.200:8080': Failed to connect to 171.67.108.200:8080: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
00:53:29:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
00:53:50:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get ID from '171.67.108.204:80': Failed to connect to 171.67.108.204:80: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
00:53:50:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment ID
00:59:59:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.200:8080
01:00:20:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get ID from '171.67.108.200:8080': Failed to connect to 171.67.108.200:8080: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
01:00:20:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.204:80
01:00:41:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Failed to get ID from '171.67.108.204:80': Failed to connect to 171.67.108.204:80: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.
01:00:41:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assignment ID
repeat ad infinitum

iirc, 171.67.108.200 assigns classic wu's (uni/non-smp) and 171.67.108.204 is a ws that is set to accept only (and has no units either).

this said, why am i not getting redirected to an appropriate AS for smp units and then getting forwarded to a WS with wu's for my config? i see at least several WS that have compatible units and ample supply. hopefully someone can point me in the right direction with this, and thanks in advance :)
This user has stopped using F@H because it supports fake crap!
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: shortage of small smp wu's?

Post by 7im »

No such thing as UNI or non-SMP work units since core_78 was retired a few years ago.

All current CPU work units are SMP only. Some projects support core counts of 1 to many, some are only 2 to many. Some are 2-8, or 2-16, some are 2-6, 8, 10, 12. No odd numbers. Some are 16-160.

If the client can't get work, you probably messed with the client proxy or network settings.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
DemonfangArun
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:23 pm
Contact:

Re: shortage of small smp wu's?

Post by DemonfangArun »

7im wrote:If the client can't get work, you probably messed with the client proxy or network settings.
nope, which is the odd part, because i would normally interpret that as a networking error, but i don't have any fancy configs or anything for networking on this laptop. going into browser works fine and if i type the ip in i just get the normal assignment server splash page (as expected). if you could think of anything else to look at i could take a look, but it has virtually the same network settings as my desktop , and that has no issues getting wu's and eating through them.

edit: found issue, apparently installing as a service caused something janky to happen in firewall settings vs a normal install. i will make a note of that, and sorry for any trouble caused by my oversight in checking firewall earlier (then again in all my years using comodo this is the first time i've seen it do this, so there's that) :roll:
This user has stopped using F@H because it supports fake crap!
Post Reply