WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105/?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Aurum
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: The Great Basin

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Aurum »

Take the Purple Pledge - Fold for Alzheimer's :D :D :D
http://alz.org/abam/
I put all of my 227 TeraFLOPs on Alzheimer's.
Besides the Alzheimer's work servers work great!!!
In Science We Trust Image
SombraGuerrero
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:06 am

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by SombraGuerrero »

I have one computer on Alzheimer's, the other on Parkinson's. Both have been cruising along wonderfully.
SteveWillis
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 12:42 am
Hardware configuration: PC 1:
Linux Mint 17.3
three gtx 1080 GPUs One on a powered header
Motherboard = [MB-AM3-AS-SB-990FXR2] qty 1 Asus Sabertooth 990FX(+59.99)
CPU = [CPU-AM3-FX-8320BR] qty 1 AMD FX 8320 Eight Core 3.5GHz(+41.99)

PC2:
Linux Mint 18
Open air case
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD
AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 6-Core Processor Black Edition with Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO - CPU Cooler with 120mm PWM Fan
three gtx 1080,
one gtx 1080 TI on a powered header

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by SteveWillis »

I've had 3 computers (11 GPUs) on 'any' and disabled firewalls for over a day now with no hang ups that I've noticed, and I've been checking very regularly.
Image

1080 and 1080TI GPUs on Linux Mint
Leonardo
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:09 am
Hardware configuration: GPU slots on home-built, purpose-built PCs.
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Leonardo »

Thanks, Steve.
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6296
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by toTOW »

Yes, the issue has been identified and fixed. Everything should now work as usual.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by bruce »

Adam A. Wanderer wrote:Is it purely random, or is there some "system"?
It's a mixture of the two, but if you eliminate the word "purely" you're probably closer to the truth.

First, the AS looks at the characteristics of your hardware and logically makes a list of all WS that have WUs that will work on your hardware. That list is modified by project priority and by by disease preference and finally the choice is randomized.

One really important step: When a server is down or runs out of WUs, it's eliminated during the list-making step. Bottom line: the message "Empty work server assignment" makes sense if you realize that the list of work servers can be reduced to zero in some rare cases (the most notorious case currently being looking for work for 7 CPU with a FAHClient version that can't negotiate that number.)
ComputerGenie
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:06 am

Assigned to work server 171.67.108.102

Post by ComputerGenie »

Mod - Merged with existing topic, check previous posts. If you are actually still having an issue getting jobs from this WS, post details here. - j

Any news on when assignments to unresponsive/offline servers will cease?
foldy
Posts: 2061
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by foldy »

It's fixed
ComputerGenie
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:06 am

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by ComputerGenie »

foldy wrote:It's fixed
In the last 2 hours?
Aurum
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: The Great Basin

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Aurum »

I have not had a single hang since I selected cause Alzheimer's.
In Science We Trust Image
ComputerGenie
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:06 am

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by ComputerGenie »

Aurum wrote:I have not had a single hang since I selected cause Alzheimer's.
That's called a "work-around", not a "fix". :roll:
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Joe_H »

ComputerGenie wrote:
foldy wrote:It's fixed
In the last 2 hours?
How about 3 days ago. Posted several posts above your first post today by toTOW.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
ComputerGenie
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:06 am

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by ComputerGenie »

Joe_H wrote:
ComputerGenie wrote:
foldy wrote:It's fixed
In the last 2 hours?
How about 3 days ago. Posted several posts above your first post today by toTOW.
How about then someone shouldn't have merged my post. Because it's either not fixed or I have a separate issue.
:x
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Joe_H »

That is not what you posted, you asked if they were fixed so it was merged with the existing topic. You have posted nothing so far to show you still have a problem, or that it is different from the previous problem.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Aurum
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: The Great Basin

Re: WU's Not Being Assigned by 171.67.108.102/171.67.108.105

Post by Aurum »

ComputerGenie wrote:
Aurum wrote:I have not had a single hang since I selected cause Alzheimer's.
That's called a "work-around", not a "fix". :roll:
Indeed, but one I feel really good about.
Workaround is as good as we can expect. You'd think they'd get F@H 7.4.17 done. My workaround for that is to use 7.4.15.
I just noticed, in 3 days I'll be in the Billionaires Club :D :shock: :lol:
In Science We Trust Image
Post Reply