missing: Project: 2451 (Run 167, Clone 8, Gen 1)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
alancabler
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Oklahoma

missing: Project: 2451 (Run 167, Clone 8, Gen 1)

Post by alancabler »

Missing credit for this WU. Both WUs before and after this one were reported correctly.

Code: Select all

[05:28:26] - Ask before connecting: No
[05:28:26] - User name: Rasterhead (Team 7)
[05:28:26] - User ID: 1835840F3CE7A3C3
[05:28:26] 
[05:28:26] Loaded queue successfully.
[05:28:26] + Benchmarking ...
[05:28:29] 
[05:28:29] + Processing work unit
[05:28:29] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[05:28:29] Core found.
[05:28:29] Working on Unit 05 [February 28 05:28:29]
[05:28:29] + Working ...
[05:28:29] 
[05:28:29] *------------------------------*
[05:28:29] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[05:28:29] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[05:28:29] 
[05:28:29] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:28:29] - Looking at optimizations...
[05:28:29] - Files status OK
[05:28:35] - Expanded 1648544 -> 8399317 (decompressed 509.4 percent)
[05:28:36] 
[05:28:36] Project: 2451 (Run 167, Clone 8, Gen 1)
[05:28:36] 
[05:28:39] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:28:39] Entering M.D.
[05:29:01] (Starting from checkpoint)
[05:29:02] Protein: p2451_Fragment-Receptor HDQ
[05:29:02] 
[05:29:02] Writing local files
[05:29:02] Completed 297609 out of 400000 steps  (74)
[05:29:05] Extra SSE boost OK.
[06:01:00] Writing local files
~~
[00:58:31] Completed 400000 out of 400000 steps  (100)
[00:58:31] Writing final coordinates.
[00:58:32] Past main M.D. loop
[00:59:32] 
[00:59:32] Finished Work Unit:
[00:59:32] - Reading up to 1327824 from "work/wudata_05.arc": Read 1327824
[00:59:32] - Reading up to 511672 from "work/wudata_05.xtc": Read 511672
[00:59:32] goefile size: 0
[00:59:32] logfile size: 267896
[00:59:33] Leaving Run
[00:59:35] - Writing 2515272 bytes of core data to disk...
[00:59:37]   ... Done.
[00:59:40] - Shutting down core
[00:59:40] 
[00:59:40] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[00:59:55] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[00:59:55] Sending work to server


[00:59:55] + Attempting to send results
[01:03:06] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[01:03:06] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[01:03:06]     (171.65.103.162:8080)
[01:03:06] - Error: Could not transmit unit 05 (completed February 29) to work server.
[01:03:06]   Keeping unit 05 in queue.


[01:03:06] + Attempting to send results
[01:06:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server
[01:06:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[01:06:15]     (171.65.103.162:8080)
[01:06:15] - Error: Could not transmit unit 05 (completed February 29) to work server.


[01:06:15] + Attempting to send results
[01:07:08] + Results successfully sent
[01:07:08] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[01:07:08] + Number of Units Completed: 79

[01:07:08]   Successfully sent unit 05 to Collection server.
[01:07:08] - Preparing to get new work unit...
Ps I lost 2 more WUs to a similar (apparent) Collection Server snafu during last December's server outages. If you think there's a hope of recovery, I'll post those logs, too.
Thanks in advance for checking...
Facts are not truth. Facts are merely facets of the shining diamond of truth.
uncle_fungus
Site Admin
Posts: 1288
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:37 am
Location: Oxfordshire, UK

Re: missing: Project: 2451 (Run 167, Clone 8, Gen 1)

Post by uncle_fungus »

Hi Rasterhead (team 7),
Your WU (P2451 R167 C8 G1) was added to the stats database on 2008-02-25 13:16:32 for 243 points of credit.
alancabler
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: missing: Project: 2451 (Run 167, Clone 8, Gen 1)

Post by alancabler »

Oh, I see.
Looking further back in that log, the unit did complete, send and credit on 2/25.
For some reason, the WU was re-issued to that machine, finished and re-sent on 2/28- which I reported, not having noticed the earlier completion.

The v6beta5 client was reported broken during that time, so I reverted to v5.04 to avoid problems, and the WU repeated for some reason.
The reversion must have caused a glitch somewhere, or beta5 never cleared the old cache, or whatever.

Thanks UF.
Facts are not truth. Facts are merely facets of the shining diamond of truth.
Post Reply