Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Moderators: Site Moderators, PandeGroup

Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Postby Bill_Eriksen » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:32 am

I seem to be missing some points. Please observe the following:

******************************* Date: 2014-06-15 *******************************
14:57:54:WU00:FS00:Core PID:409664
14:57:54:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 376249 -> 690140 (decompressed 183.4 percent)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=376249 data_size=690140, decompressed_data_size=690140 diff=0
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 6125.00 points
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
14:58:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 2 to 2
14:58:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps (0%)
15:08:45:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps (1%)
15:18:36:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps (2%)
15:28:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps (3%)
15:40:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps (4%)

The estimated 6125 points have not shown up in my stats. I need assistance to find out what has gone wrong. If anyone is willing to help me, I would appreciate it very much.
Bill_Eriksen
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Postby bruce » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:30 am

One WU was uploaded about 14:57 but you didn't show us which one. It will have DIFFERENT Project/Run?Clone/Gen numbers which were displayed when you started processing that WU. (After it was uploaded it generally takes an hour or two before it shows up in the points at Stanford and even longer if you're using one of the 3rd party stats sites.)

You started a new WU which took you 42m17s to complete 4%. It was Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332). To complete 100% of that assignment, it will take you 17h37m to process it, which means it may not have been completed yet.

Perhaps you have recently added a passkey. A passkey must be qualified by doing three things things: (1) Completing at least 10 WUs that would be eligible for a bonus and (2) Maintaining a success rate exceeding 80% and (3) NOT changing either the passkey or the UserName. Since you may not have completed that qualification process, that may explain why you won't get a bonus for these WUs.

The V7 client notices you DO have a passkey but does not know if it is qualified. The estimated points are based on the (false) assumption that it has already been qualified, but once it is qualified, the estimates will be reasonable accurate.

Was this log from Windows or OS_X?
bruce
 
Posts: 22738
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Postby Bill_Eriksen » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:56 pm

Hi Bruce, thank you for looking into this for me.

I apologize for not providing sufficient information. The log is incomplete as every time I have to reset the computer, the present log gets dumped and a new one is started. I do not know how to obtain logs that have been disposed. However, there is still some additional information that I can retrieve that is previous to the 2014-06-15 date that is at the top of log copy I have already sent.. Maybe this will help.

Code: Select all
  *********************** Log Started 2014-06-13T17:44:05Z ***********************
17:44:05:************************* Folding@home Client *************************
17:44:05:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
17:44:05:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2013 Stanford University
17:44:05:       Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
17:44:05:         Args:
17:44:05:       Config: C:/Documents and Settings/Bill/Application
17:44:05:               Data/FAHClient/config.xml
17:44:05:******************************** Build ********************************
17:44:05:      Version: 7.3.6
17:44:05:         Date: Feb 18 2013
17:44:05:         Time: 15:25:17
17:44:05:      SVN Rev: 3923
17:44:05:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
17:44:05:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
17:44:05:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
17:44:05:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp /Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
17:44:05:     Platform: win32 XP
17:44:05:         Bits: 32
17:44:05:         Mode: Release
17:44:05:******************************* System ********************************
17:44:05:          CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz
17:44:05:       CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 11
17:44:05:         CPUs: 2
17:44:05:       Memory: 1.98GiB
17:44:05:  Free Memory: 1.40GiB
17:44:05:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
17:44:05:  Has Battery: false
17:44:05:   On Battery: false
17:44:05:   UTC offset: -7
17:44:05:          PID: 1912
17:44:05:          CWD: C:/Documents and Settings/Bill/Application Data/FAHClient
17:44:05:           OS: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3
17:44:05:      OS Arch: X86
17:44:05:         GPUs: 1
17:44:05:        GPU 0: UNSUPPORTED: G98 [GeForce 8400GS]
17:44:05:         CUDA: 1.2
17:44:05:  CUDA Driver: 3010
17:44:05:Win32 Service: false
17:44:05:***********************************************************************
17:44:05:<config>
17:44:05:  <!-- Folding Slot Configuration -->
17:44:05:  <power v='full'/>
17:44:05:
17:44:05:  <!-- Network -->
17:44:05:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
17:44:05:
17:44:05:  <!-- User Information -->
17:44:05:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
17:44:05:  <team v='46123'/>
17:44:05:  <user v='Bill_Eriksen'/>
17:44:05:
17:44:05:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
17:44:05:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'/>
17:44:05:</config>
17:44:05:Trying to access database...
17:44:13:Successfully acquired database lock
17:44:14:Enabled folding slot 00: READY cpu:2
17:44:18:WU01:FS00:Starting
17:44:19:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" "C:/Documents and Settings/Bill/Application Data/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe" -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 1912 -checkpoint 15 -np 2
17:44:25:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 2480
17:44:27:WU01:FS00:Core PID:2376
17:44:27:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------*
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation
17:44:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Ensuring status. Please wait.
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations...
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Working with standard loops on this execution.
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Previous termination of core was improper.
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 3851585 -> 4394668 (decompressed 114.1 percent)
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=3851585 data_size=4394668, decompressed_data_size=4394668 diff=0
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Project: 8585 (Run 1, Clone 7, Gen 451)
17:44:39:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
17:44:44:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D.
17:44:50:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Using Gromacs checkpoints
17:44:55:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 2 to 2
17:45:04:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Resuming from checkpoint
17:45:04:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Verified 01/wudata_01.log
17:45:09:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Verified 01/wudata_01.trr
17:45:09:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Verified 01/wudata_01.edr
17:45:11:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 441580 out of 500000 steps  (88%)
18:16:49:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 445000 out of 500000 steps  (89%)
18:59:51:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 450000 out of 500000 steps  (90%)
19:42:47:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 455000 out of 500000 steps  (91%)
20:26:24:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 460000 out of 500000 steps  (92%)
21:08:37:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 465000 out of 500000 steps  (93%)
21:49:23:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 470000 out of 500000 steps  (94%)
22:30:16:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 475000 out of 500000 steps  (95%)
23:11:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 480000 out of 500000 steps  (96%)
******************************* Date: 2014-06-13 *******************************
23:52:29:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 485000 out of 500000 steps  (97%)
00:33:54:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 490000 out of 500000 steps  (98%)
00:33:55:WU00:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080
00:33:55:WU00:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home
00:33:55:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.81
00:33:55:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING cpu:2 from 171.64.65.81
00:33:55:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.81:8080
00:33:56:WU00:FS00:Downloading 367.93KiB
00:33:59:WU00:FS00:Download complete
00:33:59:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:10450 run:52 clone:0 gen:332 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000a590a3b1e7550a539e3eacf1c21
01:15:26:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 495000 out of 500000 steps  (99%)
01:57:28:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps  (100%)
01:57:30:WU01:FS00:0xa3:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Finished Work Unit:
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Reading up to 8059680 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 8059680
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:trr file hash check passed.
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:edr file hash check passed.
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:logfile size: 74628
01:57:40:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Leaving Run
01:57:42:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Writing 8171140 bytes of core data to disk...
01:57:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Done: 8170628 -> 7534339 (compressed to 92.2 percent)
01:57:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:  ... Done.
01:57:48:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Shutting down core
01:57:48:WU01:FS00:0xa3:
01:57:48:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
01:57:49:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
01:57:50:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:8585 run:1 clone:7 gen:451 core:0xa3 unit:0x00001f0b0a3b1e5952288a25875cccb7
01:57:50:WU01:FS00:Uploading 7.19MiB to 128.143.231.202
01:57:50:WU00:FS00:Starting
01:57:50:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 128.143.231.202:8080
01:57:50:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" "C:/Documents and Settings/Bill/Application Data/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe" -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 1912 -checkpoint 15 -np 2
01:57:50:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 46244
01:57:56:WU01:FS00:Upload 3.48%
01:58:03:WU01:FS00:Upload 6.96%
01:58:09:WU01:FS00:Upload 10.44%
01:58:16:WU01:FS00:Upload 13.92%
01:58:23:WU01:FS00:Upload 17.40%
01:58:29:WU01:FS00:Upload 20.87%
01:58:36:WU01:FS00:Upload 24.35%
01:58:43:WU01:FS00:Upload 27.83%
01:58:49:WU01:FS00:Upload 31.31%
01:58:56:WU01:FS00:Upload 34.79%
01:59:03:WU01:FS00:Upload 38.27%
01:59:09:WU01:FS00:Upload 41.75%
01:59:16:WU01:FS00:Upload 45.23%
01:59:22:WU01:FS00:Upload 48.71%
01:59:29:WU01:FS00:Upload 52.19%
01:59:35:WU01:FS00:Upload 54.80%
01:59:42:WU01:FS00:Upload 58.27%
01:59:48:WU01:FS00:Upload 61.75%
01:59:55:WU01:FS00:Upload 65.23%
02:00:02:WU01:FS00:Upload 68.71%
02:00:08:WU01:FS00:Upload 72.19%
02:00:15:WU01:FS00:Upload 75.67%
02:00:22:WU01:FS00:Upload 79.15%
02:00:28:WU01:FS00:Upload 82.63%
02:00:35:WU01:FS00:Upload 86.11%
02:00:42:WU01:FS00:Upload 89.59%
02:00:49:WU01:FS00:Upload 93.07%
02:00:55:WU01:FS00:Upload 96.54%
02:01:01:WU01:FS00:Upload 99.15%
02:01:04:WU01:FS00:Upload complete
******************************* Date: 2014-06-15 *******************************
14:57:54:WU00:FS00:Core PID:409664
14:57:54:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 376249 -> 690140 (decompressed 183.4 percent)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=376249 data_size=690140, decompressed_data_size=690140 diff=0
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
14:57:55:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 6125.00 points
14:57:56:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
14:58:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 2 to 2
14:58:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps  (0%)
15:08:45:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps  (1%)
15:18:36:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps  (2%)
15:28:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps  (3%)
15:40:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps  (4%)

That is the log as it presently exists down to and including all of which I referenced last night. I have not included the entire log after that as it seemed unnecessary to reference information about other work units.

In studying the log, I perceive that I may have made an error. It would seem that I have referenced the wrong work unit. I will allow that maybe I should have been talking about Project: 8585 (Run 1, Clone 7, Gen 451). Not having to work with the log very much, I find myself at a loss to adequately interpret all of the information presented. Please correct me if I have referenced the wrong work unit.

Setting the wrong work unit reference aside, the log shows that the work unit in queation (which ever one it really is) was completed and sent to Stanford and received. I did have to deal with a pass key issue, if memory serves me correctly, over a year ago, and my qualifying has long since been accomplished. Please look at my statistics and verify that I have been receiving bonus points consistently for a long time (indeed, twice this past week), which is good, as I am the only member of my team who is still folding. I do not know why the V7 Client would suddenly not know that I am fully qualified.

This log is from my Windows PC. If there is anything else I can do to help, please let me know.

Thank you, Bruce.
Bill_Eriksen
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Postby bollix47 » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:13 pm

Hi Bill_Eriksen (team 46123),
Your WU (P8585 R1 C7 G451) was added to the stats database on 2014-06-13 19:11:42 for 6126.56 points of credit.

The above includes QRB and does appear in your EOC stats on June 13 ... kakao on June 14. Both entries are combined (6,543 on kakao ... 8964 on EOC) with other returns so you won't see the exact number of points on either 3rd party site.

The topic work unit has also completed and received QRB:

Hi Bill_Eriksen (team 46123),
Your WU (P10450 R52 C0 G332) was added to the stats database on 2014-06-16 03:06:54 for 803.497 points of credit.

Again, this return was combined with another for a total of 1222.

From what I can see you are fully qualified for QRB.

Older logs (16 by default) can be found in a logs sub-directory off the Data Directory:

Start > All Programs > FAHClient > Data Directory > logs
Image
bollix47
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: Project: 10450 (Run 52, Clone 0, Gen 332)

Postby Bill_Eriksen » Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:28 pm

Thank you, Bollix47, for finding this information. With what you have found, the date referenced in the log posting above is obviously in error. Why such an error should occur, is a separate topic for discussion, and at this point, is plainly a moot point, only of academic interest, and obviously not worth any further consideration. I certainly appreciate your taking your time is look into what now appears to be a rather minor issue. Thank you very much.
Bill_Eriksen
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:09 pm


Return to Issues with a specific WU

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron