Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Postby SwingOp3 » Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:25 am

Just picked up a P10475 on Windows 7/Nvidia GTX980.
Since I can't post in the beta forum I thought I'd post my observations here. Not necessarily an issue just info.
With a clock offset of 160 Mhz and a GPU temp of 60 degrees the utilization hovers around 80% with an intermittent dip for approximately 10 seconds down to 40%.

Ppd varies from 290,000 to 325,000.
Image
SwingOp3
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:48 am

Re: Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Postby bollix47 » Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:43 am

Just an FYI:

P10475 has been on full fah since early September: viewtopic.php?p=268482#p268482

i.e. there is no longer a requirement to post in the beta forum for the core 18 projects mentioned in that announcement.

Thanks for your report ... impressive PPD.
Image
bollix47
 
Posts: 2861
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Postby bruce » Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:49 am

SwingOp3 wrote:With a clock offset of 160 Mhz and a GPU temp of 60 degrees the utilization hovers around 80% with an intermittent dip for approximately 10 seconds down to 40%.

When I see the GPU throughput dip, I also see a spike in CPU utilization so the GPU is partially waiting on my CPU. YMMV.
bruce
 
Posts: 19393
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Postby Rel25917 » Fri Oct 03, 2014 7:45 am

The dips are usually caused by the core writing a checkpoint.
Rel25917
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:31 am

Re: Project 10475 (R0, C83, G18) on GTX980

Postby Kjetil » Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:13 pm

SwingOp3 wrote:Just picked up a P10475 on Windows 7/Nvidia GTX980.
Since I can't post in the beta forum I thought I'd post my observations here. Not necessarily an issue just info.
With a clock offset of 160 Mhz and a GPU temp of 60 degrees the utilization hovers around 80% with an intermittent dip for approximately 10 seconds down to 40%.

Ppd varies from 290,000 to 325,000.

Thats very good PPD, how about 10473 at 980 now? I have only PPD 87K and TPF is 10m and 27second?
Kjetil
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:56 pm
Location: Stavanger Norway


Return to Issues with a specific WU

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron