Project: 2620 (Run 70, Clone 53, Gen 19)

[Mactin]

After completing Project: 2620 (Run 70, Clone 53, Gen 19) 3 update cycles ago , it remains uncredited.
From this server, this is the fifth one in two weeks, the sixth in a month.
From all servers, in a month : eight.
Has it all been wasted ?

If this happening to me, it must be happening to others. Does someone (at Pande Group) care ?

Yes uncredited WUs are my pet peeve.
BTW logs are available

Thanks for the help

[sortofageek]

Please give us the beginning lines of the FAHlog.txt for the client which completed that WU, through the part which shows your folding name and team number.

That WU was completed one time, but I can't tell if it was yours. It just shows a team number without a folding name.

[Mactin]

I found the problem with this WU...
I reconfigured the client at 97% at by mistake changed my ser name from "Mactin" to "`".
I'll be more carefull in the future

[ChelseaOilman]

I also suspect the client.cfg file has become corrupted.

That WU went to Mactins team and the user id # matches another client with a different machine id.

Hi ` (team 57391),
Your WU (P2620 R70 C53 G19) was added to the stats database on 2008-05-18 06:17:48 for 292 points of credit.

The other client on that same machine submitted this WU.

Hi Mactin (team 57391),
Your WU (P2611 R0 C153 G71) was added to the stats database on 2008-05-18 06:17:48 for 682 points of credit.

[ChelseaOilman]

I reconfigured the client at 97% at by mistake changed my ser name from "Mactin" to "`".

Happens to the best of us.

Glad you found it. At least the science wasn't lost.

[Mactin]

Yes, I noticed the my number of active processors did not go up with the p2611, witch was the first WU from one of the clients my new used work laptop.
The first client returned a WU yesterday and the second WU had the bad name.

I just reconfigured the names to be correct on both clients (only one was mistaken).
Both of them are now running p3903's.
I noticed they both have the same "User ID" : 694714A37F8FAB61
One is Machine ID : 1, the other 2.

Should I do something else ?

[sortofageek]

You remind me of the time when I found myself folding for sortofaggek.

[ChelseaOilman]

I noticed they both have the same "User ID" : 694714A37F8FAB61
One is Machine ID : 1, the other 2.

Should I do something else ?

No. That's the correct way to run multiple clients on the same computer.

Although the -local flag on each client wouldn't hurt.