project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
jimerickson
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Hardware configuration: Parts:
Asus H370 Mining Master motherboard (X2)
Patriot Viper DDR4 memory 16gb stick (X4)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 gpu (X16)
Intel Core i7 8700 cpu (X2)
Silverstone 1000 watt psu (X4)
Veddha 8 gpu miner case (X2)
Thermaltake hsf (X2)
Ubit riser card (X16)
Location: ames, iowa

project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Post by jimerickson »

this is the latest in a long series of these projects i have folded. i am just wondering why the ETA is always so far off on these? i got this one this morning and it is 48% done yet the ETA is 2.35 days. is it FAHControl having a problem? it messes with my head when my ppd goes so low from these. anyone have any ideas?
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Post by bruce »

FAHClient creates a databse of previous executions of a specific project, so it SHOULD learn how fast your machine is after it has run a particular project a few times. That also means that if you pause the client or sleep the OS, a much longer processing time may be recorded and used as an initial estimate. To avoid this problem, use FINISH if you're planning for the processing to be suspended more than briefly.
jimerickson
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Hardware configuration: Parts:
Asus H370 Mining Master motherboard (X2)
Patriot Viper DDR4 memory 16gb stick (X4)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 gpu (X16)
Intel Core i7 8700 cpu (X2)
Silverstone 1000 watt psu (X4)
Veddha 8 gpu miner case (X2)
Thermaltake hsf (X2)
Ubit riser card (X16)
Location: ames, iowa

Re: project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Post by jimerickson »

sorry spoke too soon. it was hung at 48% it turns out. classic slowdown before bad state i think. rebooted and its running again. we will see how far it gets.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Post by Grandpa_01 »

Jimerikson is this on a Windows box or a Linux box if it is Windows there may be hope for the problem here. viewtopic.php?f=19&t=28226 I have not had a slowdown or a Bad State with a core 21 WU since doing what I recommended in that thread. But I have also not had a P9625-9643 WU since I did it but it may be worth trying.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
jimerickson
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Hardware configuration: Parts:
Asus H370 Mining Master motherboard (X2)
Patriot Viper DDR4 memory 16gb stick (X4)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 gpu (X16)
Intel Core i7 8700 cpu (X2)
Silverstone 1000 watt psu (X4)
Veddha 8 gpu miner case (X2)
Thermaltake hsf (X2)
Ubit riser card (X16)
Location: ames, iowa

Re: project 9626 (run 1, clone 20, generation 5)

Post by jimerickson »

sorry its on a linux box. hope nvidia does something about this. thanks for the link!
Post Reply