[P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
v00d00
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:53 am
Hardware configuration: FX8320e (6 cores enabled) @ stock,
- 16GB DDR3,
- Zotac GTX 1050Ti @ Stock.
- Gigabyte GTX 970 @ Stock
Debian 9.

Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3.
Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too.
Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Location: UK
Contact:

[P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Post by v00d00 »

Just pulled this out of my log.

If someone else completed it then im happy, and will put it down to the above.

Rig is relatively stock everything. FX8320e @ 4 cores @ stock, 16GB DDR3, GTX 970 @ stock, running 18 hours per day (ish).

Code: Select all

23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2016-09-16T23:54:25Z ***********************
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Project: 13201 (Run 40, Clone 0, Gen 172)
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x00000069ab436c66577fedfe2e5878e5
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Machine: 1
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Reading tar file core.xml
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Reading tar file integrator.xml
23:54:25:WU00:FS01:0x21:Reading tar file state.xml
23:54:26:WU00:FS01:0x21:Reading tar file system.xml
23:54:27:WU00:FS01:0x21:Digital signatures verified
23:54:27:WU00:FS01:0x21:Folding@home GPU Core21 Folding@home Core
23:54:27:WU00:FS01:0x21:Version 0.0.17
23:54:30:WU01:FS01:Upload 10.98%
23:54:36:WU01:FS01:Upload 22.54%
23:54:42:WU01:FS01:Upload 33.52%
23:54:48:WU01:FS01:Upload 43.93%
23:54:54:WU01:FS01:Upload 55.49%
23:55:00:WU01:FS01:Upload 65.31%
23:55:06:WU01:FS01:Upload 75.72%
23:55:12:WU01:FS01:Upload 87.85%
23:55:19:WU01:FS01:Upload 99.41%
23:55:30:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
23:55:30:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
23:55:30:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate, 76023.00 points
23:55:30:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
23:55:39:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps (0%)
23:55:39:WU00:FS01:0x21:Temperature control disabled. Requirements: single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
23:58:56:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps (1%)
00:02:10:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps (2%)
00:05:23:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps (3%)
00:08:37:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps (4%)
00:11:50:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 100000 out of 2000000 steps (5%)
00:15:03:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 120000 out of 2000000 steps (6%)
00:18:15:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 140000 out of 2000000 steps (7%)
00:21:28:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 160000 out of 2000000 steps (8%)
00:24:41:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 180000 out of 2000000 steps (9%)
00:27:54:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 200000 out of 2000000 steps (10%)
00:28:03:WU00:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint. Is your system overclocked?
00:31:16:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps (1%)
00:34:29:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps (2%)
00:37:42:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps (3%)
00:40:56:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps (4%)
00:44:10:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 100000 out of 2000000 steps (5%)
00:47:24:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 120000 out of 2000000 steps (6%)
00:50:37:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 140000 out of 2000000 steps (7%)
00:53:51:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 160000 out of 2000000 steps (8%)
00:57:04:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 180000 out of 2000000 steps (9%)
01:00:18:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 200000 out of 2000000 steps (10%)
01:00:26:WU00:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint. Is your system overclocked?
01:03:39:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps (1%)
01:06:53:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps (2%)
01:10:07:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps (3%)
01:13:21:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps (4%)
01:16:35:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 100000 out of 2000000 steps (5%)
01:19:49:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 120000 out of 2000000 steps (6%)
01:23:03:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 140000 out of 2000000 steps (7%)
01:26:17:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 160000 out of 2000000 steps (8%)
01:29:30:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 180000 out of 2000000 steps (9%)
01:32:44:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 200000 out of 2000000 steps (10%)
01:32:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Bad State detected... attempting to resume from last good checkpoint. Is your system overclocked?
01:32:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:ERROR:Max Retries Reached
01:32:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file logfile_01.txt
01:32:52:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file badstate-0.xml
01:32:54:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file badstate-1.xml
01:32:57:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file badstate-2.xml
01:32:59:WU00:FS01:0x21:Saving result file log.txt
01:32:59:WU00:FS01:0x21:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
01:32:59:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
01:32:59:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:13201 run:40 clone:0 gen:172 core:0x21 unit:0x00000069ab436c66577fedfe2e5878e5
The client appears to have dumped it, and it has now moved on to something else (P11707) which is running happily.

Sorry i dont check in often, but RL took over a while back. Still fold on the side though. ;)
Image
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: [P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Post by Joe_H »

Too early to say for certain of this is a bad WU, but there are two reports failure on this WU in the database so far. WU's get tried a few times before being marked bad in the system. Both yours and the other report show partial credit for completing some steps, but no successful completion.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: [P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Post by Joe_H »

As a followup, the third system this WU was assigned to was able to fold it successfully:
Hi ****** (team ******),
Your WU (P13201 R40 C0 G172) was added to the stats database on 2016-09-17 04:08:10 for 13541 points of credit.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
v00d00
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:53 am
Hardware configuration: FX8320e (6 cores enabled) @ stock,
- 16GB DDR3,
- Zotac GTX 1050Ti @ Stock.
- Gigabyte GTX 970 @ Stock
Debian 9.

Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3.
Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too.
Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: [P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Post by v00d00 »

Thats fine.

Im glad someone managed to get it done.

I have had no other failures since that unit, so I guess it just didnt like my setup, for whatever reason. ;)
Image
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: [P13201, 40, 0, 172] Probably an anomaly, but...

Post by Joe_H »

I get the occasional WU like that, I blame it on cosmic rays...
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Post Reply