Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Moderators: Site Moderators, PandeGroup

Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby bcavnaugh » Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:02 pm

But at least it does not lockup the computer on the GPU and gets a New Work Unit.
I have Never seen this over the last year or two on this Host.

Code: Select all
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:*************************** Core22 Folding@home Core ***************************
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Type: 0x22
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Core: Core22
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:    Website: https://foldingathome.org/
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:  Copyright: (c) 2009-2018 foldingathome.org
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:     Author: John Chodera <john.chodera@choderalab.org> and Rafal Wiewiora
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:             <rafal.wiewiora@choderalab.org>
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Args: -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 7620 -checkpoint 15
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:             -gpu-vendor nvidia -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -cuda-device
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:             0 -gpu 0
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:     Config: <none>
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:************************************ Build *************************************
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:    Version: 0.0.1
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Date: Feb 25 2019
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Time: 19:14:08
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22: Repository: Git
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:   Revision: abeb39247cc72df5af0f63723edafadb23d5dfbe
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++ 2008
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Bits: 64
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       Mode: Release
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:************************************ System ************************************
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:        CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core Processor
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:     CPU ID: AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 1
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:       CPUs: 8
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:     Memory: 31.95GiB
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Free Memory: 29.40GiB
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:    Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22: OS Version: 6.2
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Has Battery: false
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22: On Battery: false
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22: UTC Offset: -6
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:        PID: 8868
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:        CWD: D:\ProgramData\FAHClient\work
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:         OS: Windows 10 Pro
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:    OS Arch: AMD64
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Project: 11733 (Run 0, Clone 173, Gen 66)
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Unit: 0x000000468ca304f15c82bccdacd324d2
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Reading tar file core.xml
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Reading tar file integrator.xml
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Reading tar file state.xml
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Reading tar file system.xml
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Digital signatures verified
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Folding@home GPU Core22 Folding@home Core
07:20:47:WU01:FS00:0x22:Version 0.0.1
07:20:49:WU01:FS00:0x22:Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0%)
07:20:49:WU01:FS00:0x22:Temperature control disabled. Requirements: single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
07:20:53:WU00:FS00:Upload 85.36%
07:21:05:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
07:21:06:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
07:21:06:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 84965.00 points
07:21:06:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
07:21:30:WU01:FS00:0x22:Completed 50000 out of 5000000 steps (1%)
07:43:55:WU01:FS00:0x22:Completed 1700000 out of 5000000 steps (34%)
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Completed 1750000 out of 5000000 steps (35%)
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:ERROR:exception: clWaitForEvents
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Saving result file ..\logfile_01.txt
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Saving result file checkpointState.xml
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Saving result file checkpt.crc
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Saving result file positions.xtc
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Saving result file science.log
07:44:36:WU01:FS00:0x22:Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
07:44:37:WARNING:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
07:44:37:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:11733 run:0 clone:173 gen:66 core:0x22 unit:0x000000468ca304f15c82bccdacd324d2
07:44:37:WU01:FS00:Uploading 5.79MiB to
07:44:37:WU01:FS00:Connecting to
07:44:37:WU00:FS00:Connecting to
07:44:37:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server
07:44:37:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:0:GP102 [GeForce GTX 1080 Ti] 11380 from
07:44:37:WU00:FS00:Connecting to
07:44:39:WU00:FS00:Downloading 11.65MiB
07:44:43:WU01:FS00:Upload 95.00%
07:44:45:WU00:FS00:Download 1.07%
07:44:51:WU00:FS00:Download 45.05%
07:44:52:WU01:FS00:Upload complete
07:44:52:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
07:44:52:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:Download complete
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:11733 run:0 clone:791 gen:2 core:0x22 unit:0x000000028ca304f15c8acee1f5cd5e66
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "D:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" D:\ProgramData\FAHClient\cores/cores.foldingathome.org/Win32/AMD64/NVIDIA/Fermi/Core_22.fah/FahCore_22.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 705 -lifeline 7152 -checkpoint 15 -gpu-vendor nvidia -opencl-platform 0 -opencl-device 0 -cuda-device 0 -gpu 0
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 3452
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:Core PID:9600
07:44:56:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0x22 started
07:44:57:WU00:FS00:0x22:*********************** Log Started 2019-03-15T07:44:56Z ***********************

Running OK now it seems
07:44:57:WU00:FS00:0x22:Project: 11733 (Run 0, Clone 791, Gen 2)

Mod edit: added Code tags to log
User avatar
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:39 pm

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby rwh202 » Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:19 pm

Yep, a few errors here from it too.

After several years of gestation, maybe more than 5 days on beta to iron out wrinkles might be in order... (yes, I know it's still only on advanced, not normal)
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:51 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby foldy » Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:13 pm

Seems Core_22 or project 11733 are not stable yet
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby bcavnaugh » Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:12 pm

it's off advanced now See https://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=31455&p=305753#p305753
That is ok with me I can test under Advanced being we cannot become Beta Testers. :lol:
User avatar
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:39 pm

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby rafwiewiora » Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:43 pm

Also copying that here: With the explosion of problems between beta and advanced (which is only a 2.5x increase from ~400 --> ~ 1000 GPUs), this unfortunately might be the only way to learn - I worry we might not have a diverse enough representation of systems in beta right now. Anyways, it's off advanced now, thank you all for your sacrifices. :) I get nice science logs with system configurations for all the failures now, so we'll go from there, see you with the next version!
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 8:23 pm
Location: New York

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby JimboPalmer » Fri Mar 15, 2019 7:16 pm

The nice part of a learning curve, is that rafwiewiora IS learning! Thanks for the transparency!
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Looks like Core 22 WU may not be doing so well.

Postby toTOW » Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:05 pm

Let's keep every talks about core 22 in a single thread : viewtopic.php?f=74&t=31455
Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.

FAH-Addict : latest news, tests and reviews about Folding@Home project.

User avatar
Site Moderator
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France

Return to Issues with a specific WU

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest