wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Knish
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 5:20 am

wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by Knish »

Compared to sprints 1-4, when I spot check my clients many of them are not running 1342x during sprint 5. I checked the logs of one and it got only 14 moonshot WUs out of 42. It's probably very similar for the other V100's running. Do we keep draining the moonshot servers dry? That's pretty cool if true!
Neil-B
Posts: 2027
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by Neil-B »

There may be more other covid projects running .. not sure how priorities are worked across the same preference
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by PantherX »

With the same preference, the Project weight is used which is set by the researchers depending on various factors.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Knish
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 5:20 am

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by Knish »

hmm, 4 out of 5 of the tesla GPUs are currently folding on cancer projects 16918
psaam0001
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by psaam0001 »

I've seen only a few Moonshot WU's being worked on by systems (my Win 10 system has done one or two to my knowledge).

Though, I've been putting time into getting the most out of my legacy desktop systems (just did a 2-core to 4-core Socket 775 Core2 upgrade today w/new CPU cooling fan; and recently added ASUS GT 710's where possible to get more GPU WU's processed).

Those will be the last hardware upgrades for my legacy (pre-Socket AM4) systems.... Starting in January 2021, I'm going to start saving for a real "COVID Buster".... Got my wish list set up--just got to save the money.

Paul
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by bruce »

psaam0001 wrote:... and recently added ASUS GT 710's where possible to get more GPU WU's processed
Be careful about the GT710. It's a Kepler so support is more difficult. The GT730 is at least a Fermi (I run two of them.) and the GT1030 is A LOT more GPU for a similar entry-level price.

Of course of you got a bin full of 710s, go ahead and use them for OpenCL. One nice thing about them is that they fit in a single half-height slot.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7870
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by Joe_H »

bruce wrote:Be careful about the GT710. It's a Kepler so support is more difficult. The GT730 is at least a Fermi (I run two of them.) and the GT1030 is A LOT more GPU for a similar entry-level price.
Just a small correction, support is easier for the newer Kepler based nVidia GPUs than for Fermi. The GT 710 was based on Kepler, two of the three different GT 730 cards were based on Kepler, one was based on Fermi and has 1/4 the shaders and only OpenCL 1.1 support.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by bruce »

Oops. You're right.
psaam0001
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by psaam0001 »

These GT 710's were purchased to fill in those PCIe x1 slots that were doing nothing at all.

I don't have any more PCIe slots I can use at this time. They are all full.

Wish list "A" has a system configuration w/a 64 core Epyc CPU and 7 RTX 4000's on it.

Wish list "B" has a system configuration w/a 64 core Ryzen Threadripper CPU; 1 GT 710 (PCIe x1) and 3 RTX 3090's.... :D

And Fedora will be the OS.

[Clarification: Only one of the above would be built--and only when the funds are saved up to pay for the parts in full.]

Paul
Last edited by psaam0001 on Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
psaam0001
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by psaam0001 »

BTW: My GT 1030 is on a Moonshot WU right now. :)

Paul
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by PantherX »

psaam0001 wrote:...Wish list "A" has a system configuration w/a 64 core Epyc CPU and 7 RTX 4000's on it.

Wish list "B" has a system configuration w/a 64 core Ryzen Threadripper CPU; 1 GT 710 (PCIe x1) and 3 RTX 3090's.... :D...
Personally, I would suggest a slightly different approach:

System 1 - Only CPU folder 24/7/365.25
It would be a 64C/128T that just folds CPU WUs. No dGPU at all.

System 2 - Only GPU folder 24/7/365.25
It would be vary between dual to quad GPUs depending on the PCIe lanes, PSU requirement and cooling. Each GPU would be allocated 2 CPUs

Reason is that you would have two specialized systems without making a combo box and having more efficiency and less headaches when it comes to troubleshooting or upgrading.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
psaam0001
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am
Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

Re: wondering if moonshot sprint 5 has lower # of WU

Post by psaam0001 »

Right.... These are just thoughts (only 1 system would be built). Though, my current candidate motherboard for Wishlist "B" has 3 PCIe x16 slots (supporting 16 lanes) and 1 single lane slot. I may need an extension cable for that third x16 slot though.

Besides, it might be 2 or 3 years before I have the funds saved up. Which means new hardware will be on the market, and new challenges will be on researchers minds.

Paul
Post Reply