13434 unusually high PPD

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
gunnarre
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:23 pm
Location: Norway

13434 unusually high PPD

Post by gunnarre »

I'm folding on an GTX 1660 Super which usually produces about 1.2M to 1.4M PPD, but on 13434 (Run 353, Clone 0, Gen 3) I was getting 2.6M PPD. Is this just high atom count, or is the score for this project too high? Anyone else see this?
Last edited by gunnarre on Sat Dec 26, 2020 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Online: GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1080, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580 + occasional CPU folding in the cold.
Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 960, GTX 950
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by PantherX »

It might be a Christmas bonus ;) I have asked around so let's see what happens :)
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6296
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by toTOW »

I heard that each run in these projects (134xx) doesn't have the same number of atoms ... so some might be faster than others ... since the benchmarks are trying to average it, some WUs might be faster than usual, and some will be slower ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7856
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by Joe_H »

Your 1660Super may also be hitting the spot for best return, more shaders would be partially unused.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
rewron
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:25 pm

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by rewron »

I just deleted a 13434 WU with high points.
It would have completed about 24 hours after the expiration date.

Edit: corrected WU#--Must have clumsy digits today. Thanks Gunnarre for the headsup.
Last edited by rewron on Sun Dec 27, 2020 6:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
gunnarre
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:23 pm
Location: Norway

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by gunnarre »

rewron wrote:I just deleted a 13143 WU with high points.
It would have completed about 24 hours after the expiration date.
This is a different project. Project 13434 is a COVID Moonshot sprint. Project 13143 studies the NMDA receptor on nerve cells.
Image
Online: GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1080, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580 + occasional CPU folding in the cold.
Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 960, GTX 950
Knish
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2020 5:20 am

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by Knish »

what a christmas bonus :D
V100 usually gives around 230k per WU... 13434 just returned 606k \o/
Kjetil
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:56 pm
Location: Stavanger Norway

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by Kjetil »

11029085 ppd 3090 p 13436.
HaloJones
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by HaloJones »

6195096 ppd 1080ti P13434 (349, 4, 13)
single 1070

Image
BobWilliams757
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:22 pm
Hardware configuration: ASRock X370M PRO4
Ryzen 2400G APU
16 GB DDR4-3200
MSI GTX 1660 Super Gaming X

Re: 13434 unusually high PPD

Post by BobWilliams757 »

No big bonus WU's for me lately. Then again, I was wondering why it seemed all my WU's took a performance hit. Then I noticed that at some point (after some power losses at home) my memory was reset to 1066 vs 1600. I'm just happy to be getting back to average normal returns again.

Being I've been folding on this little rig 24/7, I just got too busy to notice and assumed that there was a change in PPD averages due to larger work units or something. DOH!
Fold them if you get them!
Post Reply