Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
paulch2
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:47 pm

Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Post by paulch2 »

No idea if this one would be caugt automatically, but looked like the server accepted it.
If possible, can somebody delete that from the finished queue and re-submit it.

Odd behaviour after a Radeon software update + reboot.
First WU after the reboot zipped through in a few minutes, rather than a few hours, and seemed to be accepted OK.
Others seem to be fine since then:

10:58:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Project: 13444 (Run 6934, Clone 54, Gen 0)

10:58:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Unit: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000

10:58:19:WU00:FS01:0x22:Digital signatures verified

11:01:26:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:13444 run:6934 clone:54 gen:0 core:0x22 unit:0x00000036000000000000348400001b16
Neil-B
Posts: 2027
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Post by Neil-B »

Any chance of a fuller log post (verbosity 3) from the reboot to the completion and confirmation of the upload of the wu>
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Post by bruce »

Based on https://apps.foldingathome.org/wu#proje ... e=54&gen=0, it looks like two corrupt WUs were accepted and one was successfully completed. The user names don't look like they belong to you, paulch2, so it looks like the valid simulation was accepted and the bad ones rejected, which means the FAH servers successfully dealt with whatever the corruptions were.
paulch2
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:47 pm

Re: Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Post by paulch2 »

That one was using the vfpc username, marked as OK in that list.
Sorry, should have included the log, but that's since gone - got a bit paranoid and wiped everything to start again.
Seems to have been a one off glitch, but I'll keep an eye on it for a while.

Thanks for checking.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project 13444 WU corrupted, but accepted on upload

Post by bruce »

Did your drivers change recently? Maybe a bad revision got distributed. and then it was corrected.

The main point is the bad results didn't make it into the scientific results.
Post Reply