Community driven support forum for Folding@home
https://foldingforum.org/
For me (I assume and for other members) is sometimes easier.Google Error
Sorry, this URL is invalid
http://foldingforum.org:443/viewforum.php?f=27
Please choose from the following:
Go back to the previous page
Back to Translate
See original page
Yes, I saw the difference in http/https. It might be time to get indexed by Google Bot, or something else?bollix47 wrote:http://foldingforum.org:443/viewforum.php?f=27 is invalid because all forum links must now start with https
In total there are 20 users online :: 5 registered, 2 hidden and 13 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 175 on Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:59 am
Registered users: -alias-, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], muttonhunter, Tim_H
It took some extra work, but now thanks to uncle_fungus, there are now redirection links from the old IP address to the new secure IP address.Jesse_V wrote:I'm able to follow the old FF links just fine, thought it might just be my computer/DNS.
Excellent!bruce wrote:It took some extra work, but now thanks to uncle_fungus, there are now redirection links from the old IP address to the new secure IP address.Jesse_V wrote:I'm able to follow the old FF links just fine, thought it might just be my computer/DNS.
Code: Select all
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>302 Found</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Found</h1>
<p>The document has moved <a href="https://foldingforum.org/400.shtml">here</a>.</p>
<hr>
<address>Apache/2.2.23 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.23 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_fcgid/2.3.6 Server at foldingforum.org Port 443</address>
</body></html>Code: Select all
Found
The document has moved here.
Apache/2.2.23 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.23 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_fcgid/2.3.6 Server at foldingforum.org Port 443Code: Select all
Not Found
The requested URL /400.shtml was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.2.23 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.23 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_fcgid/2.3.6 Server at foldingforum.org Port 443Can you point me to a page where this link appears?bollix47 wrote:Using Firefox 23.0.1 if I click on http://foldingforum.org:443/viewforum.php?f=27 I get:
Changing http to https does result in the correct forum page.Code: Select all
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>302 Found</title> </head><body> <h1>Found</h1> <p>The document has moved <a href="https://foldingforum.org/400.shtml">here</a>.</p> <hr> <address>Apache/2.2.23 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.23 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_fcgid/2.3.6 Server at foldingforum.org Port 443</address> </body></html>
Code: Select all
The following notes and warnings highlight missing or conflicting information which caused the validator to perform some guesswork prior to validation, or other things affecting the output below. If the guess or fallback is incorrect, it could make validation results entirely incoherent. It is highly recommended to check these potential issues, and, if necessary, fix them and re-validate the document.
Info No Character encoding declared at document level
No character encoding information was found within the document, either in an HTML meta element or an XML declaration. It is often recommended to declare the character encoding in the document itself, especially if there is a chance that the document will be read from or saved to disk, CD, etc.
See this tutorial on character encoding for techniques and explanations.
Info Using Direct Input mode: UTF-8 character encoding assumed
Unlike the “by URI” and “by File Upload” modes, the “Direct Input” mode of the validator provides validated content in the form of characters pasted or typed in the validator's form field. This will automatically make the data UTF-8, and therefore the validator does not need to determine the character encoding of your document, and will ignore any charset information specified.
If you notice a discrepancy in detected character encoding between the “Direct Input” mode and other validator modes, this is likely to be the reason. It is neither a bug in the validator, nor in your document.
The default search uses or not and. If you require the word, you need to preface the word with +bruce wrote:Bug report: phpBB search function.
If I search for multiple words (like "stats server") it apparently counts a word-hit total, finding results that do not have both words. (In this case, posts with two or three occurrences of "server" but with no "stats" are listed.)