Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by 7im »

X86 code, yes will absolutely run on PHI, but that is not the same as SSE code. So as you said, marketing BS. Be very wary of quoting anything from a product's announcement page. ;)

And even if they fix this shortcoming, it will never be any more common (or less expensive) than a Tesla card. Just not a consumer level product.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
iceman1992
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:16 pm

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by iceman1992 »

Yeah I guess so. It seems targeted for supercomputers, which are never cheap. :e(
csvanefalk
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:28 am

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by csvanefalk »

iceman1992 wrote:Yeah I guess so. It seems targeted for supercomputers, which are never cheap. :e(
Kinda cheap if do it yourself ;)
iceman1992
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:16 pm

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by iceman1992 »

csvanefalk wrote:Kinda cheap if do it yourself ;)
I don't get what you mean. How can it be cheap? :e?:
And how "cheap" are you talking about?
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by bruce »

I wonder how Microsoft is going to treat it. Presumably you'll have to buy one of the Windows Server licenses -- or switch to Linux.
iceman1992
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:16 pm

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by iceman1992 »

bruce wrote:I wonder how Microsoft is going to treat it. Presumably you'll have to buy one of the Windows Server licenses -- or switch to Linux.
It can run as a standalone unit using factory embedded Linux.(no idea how good/capable it will be)
PinHead
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:43 am
Hardware configuration: Quad Q9550 2.83 contains the GPU 57xx - running SMP and GPU
Quad Q6700 2.66 running just SMP
2P 32core Interlagos SMP on linux

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by PinHead »

All the recent hardware seems to be moving toward general volume cloud computing for multiple users. Not, high speed parallel computing. So this appears to be an add on for Xeons to be upgradeable for mulit user cloud computing without upgrading the main chip or further investment. So it probably won't make one instance of a program run faster, but if you wanted to run mulituser on the same program; it would be faster. But probably not as fast as just running one instance on the same hardware without the add on. This has been Intel methodology for quite a few years now, not faster; just more stuff faster.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by bruce »

But isn't that the same trend as providing dua-core / quad-core / octa-core / ... multi-core CPUs, taken to an extreme, which is what the SMP client is able to take advantage of?

The only potential issue that I see is the possible lack of support of SSE extensions which is currently being required by SMP and many other FahCore's. Each Xeon core seems to be limited to the x86 instruction set rather the IA-32, x86-64 (AMD64) instruction sets supported by Sandy Bridge. which (if true) would require a version of the SMP FahCore with disable-able Assembly Optimizations and AFAIK that's not currently supported.

I think it would be stupid to release a new device without full support of the commonly accepted extensions to x86 so that's probably a misinterpretation of what we're reading, but anything is possible.
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by 7im »

PHI is geared towards "highly threaded" but simpler vector codes. If your app speeds up because it is massively parallel, then PHI is for you. But if your app is multi-threaded, but also processor intensive, like FAH, then you stick with Xeons.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
k1wi
Posts: 910
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by k1wi »

Pretty good, if length, description of Phi and GPGPU in general. Certainly outlines some of the issues that PG has been facing:
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/11/13/what ... pu-market/



"In the end, GPGPUs are a work in progress. That is the smiley happy term for the English term, "Bloody mess"."
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by 7im »

Love the Seymour Cray quote. What a great visual reference... :twisted:
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Ben_Lamb
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:41 am

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by Ben_Lamb »

The Semiaccurate article on the Phi is very interesting and indicates that it thinks gpgpu is a dead duck. It also indicates that the launch of the Phi is a killer blow to Nvidias gpgpu dominance. Who knows but a lot of people are always predicting nvidias demise, what I see is the gpu becoming like a cpu and vice versa so I suppose the future either lies in a socket or an add in card. Who knows the next thing may be a coprocessor chip from intel. I can see the motherboards now with a spare socket for a knights corner chip just like the math coprocessor all over again. All I know is I wont be able to afford one :(

It has been mentioned that the main barrier stopping Xeon Phi folding is its lack of SSE support. Would the Phi not be able to use standard loops without optimizations. I have found my Xeon only slows down slightly using the standard loops.
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by Napoleon »

Ben_Lamb wrote:It has been mentioned that the main barrier stopping Xeon Phi folding is its lack of SSE support. Would the Phi not be able to use standard loops without optimizations. I have found my Xeon only slows down slightly using the standard loops.
A? fahcores are hardcoded to SSE. AFAIK, only old fahcore_78 actually switches dynamically between FPU and SSE. The performance difference is quite big.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by 7im »

Correct. No SSE means 3X slower on fahcores that can down shift like core _78. All other CPU cores won't run at all without SSE support.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Ben_Lamb
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:41 am

Re: Intel MIC (aka Xeon Phi)

Post by Ben_Lamb »

Ok thanks, what does the message folding with standard loops on this execution mean then. Allways thought the assembly optimizations were things like sse.
Post Reply