Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.

Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Poll ended at Sun May 18, 2008 11:06 pm

AMD
3
23%
intel
10
77%
 
Total votes: 13

tear
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
Hardware configuration: None
Location: Rocky Mountains

Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by tear »

Your thoughts? Your votes? I don't have strong preference, should I?

AMD: newegg wishlist
intel: newegg wishlist


Thanks!
tear

P.S.
And yes, I am also considering cheapest 3870s [still less money than 3870 X2].
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6296
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by toTOW »

Intel, because you can overclock it to +3 GHz (remember that some small WU are CPU limited ... so the better CPU you get, the better GPU will perform in this case)

But I don't know if it will be enough as the two GPU will use only PCIe 8x (we might need an official comment about this) ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
tear
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
Hardware configuration: None
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by tear »

Thanks toTOW.
Noted, though I usually do not overclock ;-)


tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
Image
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6296
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by toTOW »

Ok, by the way, that's coherent with your choice of two 3850 instead of 3870 (which are more CPU limited) ;)
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
susato
Site Moderator
Posts: 511
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:57 am
Location: Team MacOSX
Contact:

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by susato »

If I bought a computer today, I'd have to go with a quad core rig, for the flexibility and "futureproofing". The wave of the future in all computing is toward multiple cores and parallel processing. The quads are not all that expensive now - and for the same processing power as two dual core CPUs you only have to buy one mobo, power supply, case, hard drive, videocard etc. Heh, I heard from one power folder that part of his reason for switching to quads is that his router table is getting full! Why not 8-way machines? Two quad processors and a server mobo together are too expensive for my hobby budget.

Speaking only as a long term Folder (and NOT in any official capacity, I'm just a peacekeeper here): As time passes the work units just get bigger and longer. When I first started in fall 2003 I folded my share of 33-point p241's and 20-point p729s, and the dreaded p1136 series TINKERs which took nearly 2 weeks to run on a 500 MHz PowerMac G4 and were worth 71 points (later upgraded to 241, IIRC). I started folding on a 700 MHz eMac which got (and still gets) 1 pph. It was somewhat below the mean for "Folding iron" when I started -- now it's falling off the low end of the equipment spectrum. Though the benchmark machine has changed, the current point structure is generally compatible with those older units, within a factor of 2 anyway. It's nearly 4 years since I started Folding, and I'm now routinely folding work units valued at 100x those early units. In another 2-3 years my dual-core machines, now a bit below the mean, will be low end in their turn. I might upgrade a low-end duallie (AMD 64 x2 3800, Opteron 165, Core Duo) to a higher speed processor but \right now I simply wouldn't build or buy new dual core machines.
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by P5-133XL »

I'd definately go Quad Intel with a 3870.
Image
tear
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
Hardware configuration: None
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by tear »

Many thanks for your input.

FWIW, machine's purpose is a dedicated FAH/GPU setup. That's where dual-core
idea came from (one core per GPU).

I also believe that today's mainstream machines should be good for two or so
years (fah-wise) and I think that either of two options gives some room
for future upgrades [shall they become necessary].

So... going dual-core saves me some money for, say... yet another
2x Xeon 53xx/54xx setup. That's my take at least.


tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
Image
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by 7im »

tear wrote:
FWIW, machine's purpose is a dedicated FAH/GPU setup. That's where dual-core
idea came from (one core per GPU).
Why limit yourself? Run 2 GPU, and also run 2 CPU clients.

And dual core GPUs seem to be following the trend of CPUs, so the extra 2 CPU cores of a Quad help to futureproof the system even more. And the price differences are small by comparison.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6296
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by toTOW »

Am I the only one to wonder if PCIe 8x + 8x will be enough to feed to GPU or if he'd better go for a X38 motherboard with 16x + 16x :?:
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
tear
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
Hardware configuration: None
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by tear »

As a datapoint, AGP 8x is enough to saturate [98-99%] 3850 [P4711-P4713] here.

And I suspect that we're going to see more high-atom WUs rather than
low-atom WUs.


tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
Image
uncle fuzzy
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by uncle fuzzy »

I built AMDs for about 10 years. That was my pre-FAH period. My sole dedicated folder is a Q6600. The new one I built for my mother, also to fold, is an E4500. I'm current shopping the parts for another Q6600, and thinking about replacing my current gaming box (X2 6000+) with an E8500.

Bang for the buck-
General use and midlevel gaming- AMD all the way.
Speed folding and heavy gaming- I gotta go with Intel, much as it hurts me to say so

I'll probably get slapped for saying it, but with a quad you have 2 cores for the GPUs, and still have an idle "dual core" for the SMP. It should still be as fast as, or faster than, my 6000+ on an SMP WU.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!

Image
Kingcarcas
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:20 am

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by Kingcarcas »

Intel, but bust open the piggy bank and try to get the E7200.
Image
the animal
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: TeAm Anandtech

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by the animal »

I'd replace the PSU with a Corsair 550VX or 650TX.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by bruce »

uncle fuzzy wrote:I'll probably get slapped for saying it, but with a quad you have 2 cores for the GPUs, and still have an idle "dual core" for the SMP. It should still be as fast as, or faster than, my 6000+ on an SMP WU.
:slap: :slap: ;)

The only problem with this idea is that as Stanford continues towards using all of the capatities that you're willing to donate. they may decide to give more difficult WUs to 4-core machines, compared to 2-core machines. (They've already been doing something like that, but not all of the time.) If your SMP machine tells the server that you have 4-cores, the server will not know that you've only got two of them available.
Nonymoussurfer
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:44 pm
Hardware configuration: Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz - 9657AB, OCZ600SXS 2x8800GS 1x running GPU2, VM-Notfred SMP (2), Vista 32bit
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35V, EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35E, Antec 650W. Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 B3 @3.0GHz - P5B-965 Deluxe EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 G0 @2.8GHz - GA-G31M-S2L EA380, Notfred SMP diskless
E6300 B2 @3.0GHz - GA-965P-DS3,, CP-500T, HD3870 GPU2, XP MCE
E2160@1.8GHz generic emachine, EA380, 9600GSO GPU2,1 CPU client, vista 32bit
P4@3.2GHz generic emachine, NEO380, 8800GT GPU2, XP MCE
Athlon64@2.2GHz - NFK8AB-RS, EA430, 8800GT GPU2, XP Pro 32bit
Location: Wichita

Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?

Post by Nonymoussurfer »

bruce wrote: If your SMP machine tells the server that you have 4-cores, the server will not know that you've only got two of them available.
Running SMP on a virtual linux machine (or the Notfred CD) through VMware takes care of that problem, doesn't it?
Post Reply