AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Post Reply
Paragon
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:24 am
Hardware configuration: Rig1 (Dedicated SMP): AMD Phenom II X6 1100T, Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3 board, 8 GB Kingston 1333 DDR3 Ram, Seasonic S12 II 380 Watt PSU, Noctua CPU Cooler

Rig2 (Part-Time GPU): Intel Q6600, Gigabyte 965P-S3 Board, EVGA 460 GTX Graphics, 8 GB Kingston 800 DDR2 Ram, Seasonic Gold X-650 PSU, Artic Cooling Freezer 7 CPU Cooler
Location: United States

AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

Post by Paragon »

I'm a bit late to the game on this one, but I just finished a review of an XFX RX 480 8GB.

https://greenfoldingathome.com/2019/02/ ... me-review/

My PPD average came out a bit lower than what I was expecting at 245K, but it might just be the work units I had over the three days. Basically, anyone looking to get into Folding@Home for cheap should go with an Nvidia GTX 1060 instead for both performance and efficiency reasons. But, it was an interesting card to play with. I like that AMD includes a compute mode on their windows graphics drivers. If only Nvidia would do the same!
Theodore
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:07 pm

Re: AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

Post by Theodore »

An RTX 2080 is even better, if you can afford one!

I wished Nvidia or AMD would make stream processor cards for folding.
2GB of DDR6 ram, and 3000-5000 stream processors, should be cheaper for them to manufacture,than an entire graphics card!
Plus, these cards could be used as coprocessors for gamers.
gordonbb
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:12 pm
Hardware configuration: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS; NVidia 525.60.11; 2 x 4070ti; 4070; 4060ti; 3x 3080; 3070ti; 3070
Location: Great White North

Re: AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

Post by gordonbb »

Interesting,

I’m just getting my PPD monitoring working and my initial numbers show 3.83kPPD/W for one of my 1060 6GB and 3.96 for the other.

In comparison:
1070Ti 5.78kPPD/W
RTX 2060 6.81kPPD/W
RTX 2070 7.39kPPD/W

This is using the smoothed average of PPD reported by the FAHclient divided by the Power Draw reported by nvidia-smi sampled once a minute over 20 hours so far.

All cards are running Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS Server and using the current Nvidia 410 or 415 drivers and these values are consistent with what I’ve observed.

I’ve also been capturing overall System Efficiency by sampling total PPD as reported by the FAHclient and dividing it by the output wattage reported by the SNMP card in the dual-conversion UPS two of the folding systems are connected to.

The system with the 2 RTX cards is averaging 6.33kPPD/W over the last 24 hours and the system with the 1070Ti and one of the 1060s 3.97kPPD/W but that system also seems to report about a 10W higher system overhead (UPS o/p less sum of reported GPU draw) and I suspect that the UPS needs it’s electrolytic capacitors replaced on its inverter (they are both over 10 years old and were being trashed at my workplace)

I have confidence in the UPSes reported power draw as it is consistent with results from my Kill-a-Watt and they (PowerWare, now Easton) are well engineered and I’ve been using their big brothers in data centres and telecommunications closets for many years.
Image
gordonbb
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:12 pm
Hardware configuration: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS; NVidia 525.60.11; 2 x 4070ti; 4070; 4060ti; 3x 3080; 3070ti; 3070
Location: Great White North

Re: AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

Post by gordonbb »

Googling (yes, that is a verb in our household) to find an post in the Nvidia Developer Forums where the accuracy of the values reported by nvidia-smi was stated (+/- 5W) I also found this presentation which also cites this source.
Image
gordonbb
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:12 pm
Hardware configuration: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS; NVidia 525.60.11; 2 x 4070ti; 4070; 4060ti; 3x 3080; 3070ti; 3070
Location: Great White North

Re: AMD RX 480 - Quick Review

Post by gordonbb »

This might help explain why MSI seems to report a lower wattage than your Kill-a-Watt
Image
Post Reply