Computing power vs cost

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Naze
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:02 pm

Computing power vs cost

Post by Naze »

So I ran my computer overnight for the first time folding proteins. I started thinking about the cost of running my PC for extended periods of time(electric bill) vs just donating money. So I figured I'd ask here:

Let just say speaking hypothetically it costs me an extra 40 dollars a month to run my PC every night folding proteins. I will use last night as a guideline to how many proteins I can fold, I earned ~12,300 points and ~9 WU's(#8 is about 80% done).

Would you guys rather just have 40 dollars a month from me or would you rather me earn the 369,000 points / 270 WU's? Since I am unsure of how much my electric bill will increase because of this... At what point, money wise, would you rather have the donation over the processing power? $30? $40? $50? $100? How much value do you place on 270 WU's, or even a single WU for that matter?

I ask for a couple reasons. If the money would further the research better then it makes no sense for me to continuing to donate this way. Also if it is kind of close either way it might be worth saving the wear and tear on my pretty graphics card / CPU getting maxed out for 9 hours at a time.

Any admin response is much appreciated! Thanks!
foldy
Posts: 2061
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by foldy »

I think if your PC already has much GPU power it is more value to FAH to let this GPU fold.
e.g. fast GPUs fold like 200k to 500k PPD (thousand points per day).
Your PC seems little weak with only maybe 30k PPD.
If we cannot configure FAH to get out more PPD of your PC then donating just the money maybe a good option?
wilding2004
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:16 pm

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by wilding2004 »

foldy wrote: Your PC seems little weak with only maybe 30k PPD.
Or possibly he's only getting base points? I don't know. I think the science done is more valuable than the money. If you donate small amounts of money, somebody has to then spend time collecting the hardware to build the systems to do the science.

Since he's already got the hardware he can get straight to the "do science" bit. Now if somebody was to donate some serious money, that might change the equation somewhat.
Nathan_P
Posts: 1180
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:22 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus Z8NA D6C, 2 x5670@3.2 Ghz, , 12gb Ram, GTX 980ti, AX650 PSU, win 10 (daily use)

Asus Z87 WS, Xeon E3-1230L v3, 8gb ram, KFA GTX 1080, EVGA 750ti , AX760 PSU, Mint 18.2 OS

Not currently folding
Asus Z9PE- D8 WS, 2 E5-2665@2.3 Ghz, 16Gb 1.35v Ram, Ubuntu (Fold only)
Asus Z9PA, 2 Ivy 12 core, 16gb Ram, H folding appliance (fold only)
Location: Jersey, Channel islands

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by Nathan_P »

It would also be useful to know what machine he has folding - we may then be able to give some idea of monthly running costs.
Image
7im
Posts: 10189
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by 7im »

Also consider that donating money is tax deductible in the US (and maybe elsewhere). Some employers will even match your donation to a non-profit which doubles your donation.

Stanford welcomes all donations. Some people prefer to donate in small portions using hardware they already have. Others purchase more hardware just to run FAH. Some people answer questions in the forum. Or do beta testing on new fah software. Some fold and donate money.

I don't think they have a preference of cash vs. work units or any of that. It would cost Stanford about the same amount of money either way to run those work units. But considering the current penchant of the US Congress for not funding a lot of research, the cash may actually be more helpful at times; upgrading servers, more storage drives, etc.

Let each person give according to their ability.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Naze
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:02 pm

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by Naze »

Just an FYI for people asking. My GPU is a GTX 980ti, and my CPU is an Intel i7 4790k.
Ricky
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 1:34 am
Hardware configuration: 1. 2 each E5-2630 V3 processors, 64 GB RAM, GTX980SC GPU, and GTX980 GPU running on windows 8.1 operating system.
2. I7-6950X V3 processor, 32 GB RAM, 1 GTX980tiFTW, and 2 each GTX1080FTW GPUs running on windows 8.1 operating system.
Location: New Mexico

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by Ricky »

Naze,

If you have your key entered, you will get early return bonus. After 10 work units, you should see more than 500k PPD. The card you have is one of the most efficient for folding.
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by bruce »

There are two important considerations.

First, there's equipment costs.
If you already own the equipment and you give money to FAH so they can buy some percentage of a more powerful machine, it's obviously going to be more efficient to use equipment that you bought so you could get your email/browse the web/whatever and also use id for folding. If you're spending money specifically to buy hardware for FAH, then it doesn't work out that way.

Second, there's the power costs..
If you're considering donating money to Stanford to do the processing that you might be doing, it's a more complicated calculation. First, the cost of business power is rarely lower than the cost of the same amount of power for your home -- but that tends to be a very complicated calculation. Second, buying power is taxable, whereas donating money is not. I don't know enough about those two power cost alternatives to make an intelligent recommendation.
foldy
Posts: 2061
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441

Re: Computing power vs cost

Post by foldy »

@Naze: If you are unsure if your FAH client is configured for max performance on your GTX 980ti then you can post the fah logfile and we can check it.
Post Reply