Query on feasibility

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
moos3h
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:28 pm

Query on feasibility

Post by moos3h »

Hey all,

I am new to folding@home and I will most likely start folding at home. However the company I work for has between 200 - 400 systems which are idle for up to 24 hours (all varying specifications). Would it be feasible to turn their idle GPU and CPU power to folding? Or would it be a giant headache to sort out.
Neil-B
Posts: 2027
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21
Location: UK

Re: Query on feasibility

Post by Neil-B »

There are a number of hurdles … first of which is usually permission from the "CEO" or whoever owns the kit … then the IT Security Teams my well have Policies that forbid this type of thing … and the matter of increased electricity for running kit and cooling and the inevitable kit failures that occur when running on larger pools of kit - not as such FAHs fault but that some kit will just fail when worked hard for many reasons (and FAAH works kit hard) … So in some ways it can seem to be a massive migraine.

Having said that there are many large/medium/small corporate contributors and numerous people have succeed in working through the layers of things to be sorted and are making great contribution - having "CEO" and IT Teams support tends to be pretty essential though.
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070

(Green/Bold = Active)
moos3h
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:28 pm

Re: Query on feasibility

Post by moos3h »

Thanks I am just looking at the feasibility of it before we approach the Director on this, a few top level managers are onboard so that is the first hurdle!
HaloJones
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: Query on feasibility

Post by HaloJones »

The client needs to be installed, not started, a configuration file created and set up, then the whole thing packaged up and deployed to all the machines. You need to start the machines up in small waves to avoid them all trying to get work simultaneously and also to be sure they're working properly.

It massively helps if all the machines are identical. If they aren't you might need individual configurations for each type.

You then need to be able to monitor them all so setting up a central machine that can stop and start the clients. All good fun if you have nothing else to do.
single 1070

Image
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7857
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Query on feasibility

Post by Joe_H »

There have been a few topics here on deploying to large groups of machines over the last 4-6 weeks. Most have not been active the last 2-3 weeks, but a search for this topics should turn up some information from others who have done this.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Query on feasibility

Post by PantherX »

Welcome to the F@H Forum moos3h,

I know that this application was a substitute for FAHControl to monitor clients: https://gitlab.com/nilslennart.bruns/fahcluster
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Post Reply