Core 17 eats 1 cpu core with Nvidia GPU?

If you think it might be a driver problem, see viewforum.php?f=79

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Core 17 eats 1 cpu core with Nvidia GPU?

Post by P5-133XL »

I run GPU folding on a straight 3.2 GHz P4 using a GTX 460 and it produces the same PPD as my higher-end machines regardless of the core used. However, I do need to dedicate the full CPU to it i,e, no CPU folding.

Part of the problem may be your CPU folding with the GPU folding. By default the CPU will use both cores but Core_17 requires a full CPU core with Nvidia video cards which is not true for previous GPU cores. Over-subscribing the CPU is a disaster for PPD.

The next part is that the GT 620 is a lower-end GPU and because of that it will not be as productive on Core_17 as previous cores. Core_17 decreased the base points and added QRB (Quick return bonus) points to compensate. However, because your GT 620 is low-end (The GTX 460 is the equivalence point) it will not gain more QRB points than lost base points producing a net loss in PPD.

your best solution currently is not to use client-type=advanced so as not get Core_17. Unfortunately, that may not be a solution long-term because eventually Core_17 will become general-release. PG knows about this issue and is working on a long-term solution.
Image
Post Reply