core 0x17 GPU usage

If you think it might be a driver problem, see viewforum.php?f=79

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: core 0x17 GPU usage

Post by bruce »

CBT wrote:Btw. why doesn't core_15 receive any bonus points? That could 'solve' part of the issue.
There are a number of forum topics discussing that issue, as well as a topic on the FAH subreddit.

Simple answer: Historic reasons. Core_15 was released before bonus points were applied to anything other than SMP and it has never been changed.

(and bonus points are not related to GPU Utilization numbers.)
CBT
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:07 am
Hardware configuration: Computer 1:
CPU: Intel Q6600@2,4GHz
RAM: 8GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1
Video: EVGA GTX550Ti SC (NVIDIA GeForce GTX550Ti GPU - 1GB GDDR5)
(OC: GPU@981MHz / Shaders@1962 / Memory@4514)
PSU: OCZ StealthXtream 600 Watt
Client 7.4.4

Computer 2:
CPU: AMD AthlonII X4 635 @2.9GHz
RAM: 4GB
OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP2
Client 7.4.4, configured as a service

Computer 3:
CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K @4.0GHz
GPU: EVGA GTX980 @1.518GHz
RAM: 32 GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1
Client 7.4.4

Computer 4:
CPU: Intel Core i5 M560 @2,67GHz
RAM: 4 GB
OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
Client: Win-SMP2

Computer 5:
CPU: Intel Core i3 4370 @3.8GHz
RAM: 8GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1
Client 7.4.4 configured as a service
Location: Netherlands

Re: core 0x17 GPU usage

Post by CBT »

I just tried CPU:3.
'% GPU Usage' for the Core_17 went up slightly from 88-89% to 89-90%. Yet the TPF for the Core_a4 on the CPU nearly doubled from 1m22s to 2m24s.
Not an ideal combination, so I quickly reverted to CPU:7.
Image
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: core 0x17 GPU usage

Post by bruce »

For SMP folding, CPU:3 is not a good choice because there's at least one FPU that FAH is not able to use (depending on which CPU you have). CPU:7 may or may not be ideal, because some projects consider it to be a "large prime" and others do not, so your choice of projects is more limited. I would experiment with CPU:4 or CPU:6 but testing can be tricky. (You have to be sure to compare results with the same WU or with closely related WUs.)
Post Reply