HD7790 and Project 11292

It seems that a lot of GPU problems revolve around specific versions of drivers. Though AMD has their own support structure, you can often learn from information reported by others who fold.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
scmo
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:39 am

HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by scmo »

Curious to know if anyone had thoughts on slow performance of newly added HD7790. Working on project 11292 WU and currently running at 1,508 PPD and TPF of 21 mins 13 sec. In FAHbench 1.1.2 benchmarking, HD7790 outperformed GTX 650 Ti by 44% in OpenCL single precision Explicit (12.2037 v 8.49785 ns) and 63% in Implicit (70.8036 v 43.4377 ns). Yet, in folding, performance is barely better than an HD6450. Believe AMD driver is v13.4. Log below for reference.

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2013-05-11T17:32:03Z ***********************
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:Starting
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Mo/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/ATI/R600/Core_16.fah/FahCore_16.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 3700 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0 -gpu-vendor ati
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 4192
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:Core PID:4312
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0x16 started
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:*------------------------------*
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Folding@Home GPU Core
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Version 2.11 (Thu Dec 9 15:00:14 PST 2010)
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.30729.01 for 80x86 
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Build host: user-f6d030f24f
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Board Type: AMD/OpenCL
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Core      : x=16
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16: Window's signal control handler registered.
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Preparing to commence simulation
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:- Looking at optimizations...
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:- Files status OK
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:sizeof(CORE_PACKET_HDR) = 512 file=<>
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:- Expanded 44828 -> 171163 (decompressed 381.8 percent)
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=44828 data_size=171163, decompressed_data_size=171163 diff=0
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:- Digital signature verified
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Project: 11292 (Run 1, Clone 24, Gen 20)
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Assembly optimizations on if available.
17:32:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Entering M.D.
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Will resume from checkpoint file 00/wudata_01.ckp
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Tpr hash 00/wudata_01.tpr:  3032318023 1598319029 2227781785 4140995055 1718344867
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Working on ALZHEIMER DISEASE AMYLOID
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Client config unavailable.
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Starting GUI Server
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Resuming from checkpoint
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: retreived and current tpr file hash:
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:   0   3032318023   3032318023
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:   1   1598319029   1598319029
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:   2   2227781785   2227781785
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:   3   4140995055   4140995055
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:   4   1718344867   1718344867
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: file hashes same.
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: state restored.
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.log Verified 00/wudata_01.log
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.trr Verified 00/wudata_01.trr
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.xtc Verified 00/wudata_01.xtc
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: name 00/wudata_01.edr Verified 00/wudata_01.edr
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:fcCheckPointResume: state restored 2
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Resumed from checkpoint
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Setting checkpoint frequency: 599999
17:32:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed         3 out of 59999936 steps (0%).
17:51:02:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed    600000 out of 59999936 steps (1%).
18:10:12:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   1199999 out of 59999936 steps (2%).
18:29:25:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   1799999 out of 59999936 steps (3%).
18:48:41:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   2399998 out of 59999936 steps (4%).
19:08:20:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   2999997 out of 59999936 steps (5%).
19:28:00:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   3599997 out of 59999936 steps (6%).
19:47:42:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   4199996 out of 59999936 steps (7%).
20:07:26:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   4799995 out of 59999936 steps (8%).
20:27:09:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   5399995 out of 59999936 steps (9%).
20:47:13:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   5999994 out of 59999936 steps (10%).
21:07:32:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   6599993 out of 59999936 steps (11%).
21:27:51:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   7199993 out of 59999936 steps (12%).
21:48:20:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   7799992 out of 59999936 steps (13%).
22:08:45:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   8399992 out of 59999936 steps (14%).
22:29:17:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   8999991 out of 59999936 steps (15%).
22:50:12:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed   9599990 out of 59999936 steps (16%).
23:11:03:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  10199990 out of 59999936 steps (17%).
23:31:57:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  10799989 out of 59999936 steps (18%).
******************************* Date: 2013-05-11 *******************************
23:52:55:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  11399988 out of 59999936 steps (19%).
00:13:58:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  11999988 out of 59999936 steps (20%).
00:35:09:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  12599987 out of 59999936 steps (21%).
00:56:21:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  13199986 out of 59999936 steps (22%).
01:17:33:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  13799986 out of 59999936 steps (23%).
01:38:49:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  14399985 out of 59999936 steps (24%).
02:00:05:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  14999984 out of 59999936 steps (25%).
02:21:16:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  15599984 out of 59999936 steps (26%).
02:42:31:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  16199983 out of 59999936 steps (27%).
03:03:46:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  16799983 out of 59999936 steps (28%).
03:24:29:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  17399982 out of 59999936 steps (29%).
03:45:58:WU00:FS00:0x16:Completed  17999981 out of 59999936 steps (30%).
Mod Edit: Added Code Tags - PantherX
Top
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:
Contact PantherX

Re: HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by PantherX »

Please note that FAHBench is based upon FahCore_17 and not FahCore_16. FahCore_17 is based upon OpenCL and is currently being beta tested. There are many differences between FahCore_16 and FahCore_17, the main ones are:
1) Uses OpenCL
2) Significantly better performance on AMD GPUs
3) More efficient code base

One option is to wait until FahCore_17 is released to the public.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Top
scmo
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:39 am

Re: HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by scmo »

PantherX, Thanks for the clarification on the cores. Any guess on release date of FAHCore_17?
Top
tlg
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:26 pm
Hardware configuration: Mobile:
i7 3610QM @ 2.3GHz
nVIDIA GTX 630m (not folding)
8GB Ram
Win 7 x64

Desktop:
i7 860 @ 2.8GHz
Asus nVIDIA GTX 660ti
8GB RAM
Win 7 x64
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by tlg »

Probably a couple of months. They had some issues before with the a group of work units and I'm willing to bet that they don't want that to happen again. Due Diligence and what not.
It's not a retreat, it's a Tactical Withdrawal. Get it right!
Top
proteneer
Pande Group Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:03 pm
Location: Stanford, CA
Contact:
Contact proteneer

Re: HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by proteneer »

soon

our development style is:

internal->beta->adv->public
He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how

www.proteneer.com
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7868
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: HD7790 and Project 11292

Post by Joe_H »

One thing to mention, processing Core 16 WU's is known to work better with the older OpenCL support provided by the 12.8 release of the Catalyst drivers. Some persons have reported success using the older SDK with just the driver from a newer release. But all remnants of the newer SDK need to be removed for that to work. That has been covered in other topics.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Problems with AMD/ATI drivers”