Folding@Home Benchmark 1.2.0 (GUI)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Spongebob25
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:27 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus z490
i7 11700k
32 GB Gskill ram
Evga 2080 XC Black
1 TB Samsung 980 SSD

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by Spongebob25 »

Version 4 give me an error in Windows 8------

This app can't run on your PC.
To find a version for your PC, check with the software publisher.

Code: Select all

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
(c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Windows\system32>cd C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe --display-devices --disable
-splash
Access is denied.

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>
Please advise.
Image
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta Testing

Post by Napoleon »

proteneer wrote:The core will be OpenCL only (and no it won't be hackable to load in CUDA :P) mainly for reasons you've witnessed above in people trying to get the CUDA version to work. It's way too much work to enforce people to DL CudaSDK and to get people to download the right version of visual studio.
Just for clarification: are we talking about the upcoming FahCore_v17 (or something even newer) becoming OpenCL only, or this benchmark, or both? And if we're talking about the FahCore, will NVidia cards be able to run it with the NVidia OpenCL implementation, as is the case with this benchmark?
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
IvantheDugtrio
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:56 am

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by IvantheDugtrio »

Here's what I'm getting for my system with a Core i5 3570K, HD 7870 GHz edition, and GT 640 at their stock clocks.

http://imgur.com/52wTaTZ

Explicit:
3.97548ns/day

Implicit:
20.7468ns/day

I'm guessing these scores are a tad low given the hardware used. I'm not really sure how the tests work so I'm not sure which GPU was stressed more or which ones were stressed at all.
rjbelans
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by rjbelans »

IvantheDugtrio wrote:Here's what I'm getting for my system with a Core i5 3570K, HD 7870 GHz edition, and GT 640 at their stock clocks.

http://imgur.com/52wTaTZ

Explicit:
3.97548ns/day

Implicit:
20.7468ns/day

I'm guessing these scores are a tad low given the hardware used. I'm not really sure how the tests work so I'm not sure which GPU was stressed more or which ones were stressed at all.
Your screenshot shows you only did -deviceId 0, so that is only one card. From the numbers, that was probably your GT 640.
Image
Image
folding@evga - Donor Advisory Board Representative
IvantheDugtrio
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:56 am

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by IvantheDugtrio »

rjbelans wrote: Your screenshot shows you only did -deviceId 0, so that is only one card. From the numbers, that was probably your GT 640.
What's odd is that usually my 7870 is deviceID 0. In Folding@Home Control It always shows up in slot 0, where the GT 640 shows up in slot 1. Same with GPU-Z where the 7870 is always above the GT 640 in the list.
proteneer
Pande Group Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:03 pm
Location: Stanford, CA
Contact:

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by proteneer »

bruce wrote:Do you plan to port FAHBench to Linux or OSX any time soon?
yes - it would be fairly easy to actually
He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how

www.proteneer.com
proteneer
Pande Group Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:03 pm
Location: Stanford, CA
Contact:

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta Testing

Post by proteneer »

bruce wrote:
proteneer wrote:
Napoleon wrote:Do I actually have to install the whole CUDA5 Toolkit to try this? I've got Visual Studio Express already, as well as NVidia 310.90 WHQL driver, which does have CUDA5 support.
Unfortunately yes. The CUDA platform does a lot of JIT compilation and hence requires the nvcc compiler. We assume the user has the NVIDIA GPU COMPUTING TOOLKIT 5.0 installed (and hence why its able to find CUFF).
proteneer wrote:Updated the download with some additional libraries - please redownload. Should fix OpenMMOpenCL.dll errors.
Did this ever get resolved? I have 0.4 and without installing the toolkit I ran the http://www.dependencywalker on the OpenMMOpenCL.dll file that came with the benchmark. I don't know if you're still interested in the results.

Code: Select all

Error: At least one required implicit or forwarded dependency was not found.
Error: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in an implicitly dependent module.
Error: Modules with different CPU types were found.
Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found.
Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in a delay-load dependent module.
Three files could not be found:
CUFFT32_50-35.DLL
MVSCR90.DLL
IESHIMS.DLL

I'm not sure if you ever want to make FAHBench download all it's dependencies, but if you do, I though this might help.

I'll install the toolkit now.

In the meantime, plain vanilla (no overclock):

Code: Select all

C:\Users\bruce\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe --display-devices --disable-splash
[1] compatible platform(s):
  -- 0 --
  PROFILE = FULL_PROFILE
  VERSION = OpenCL 1.1 CUDA 4.2.1
  NAME = NVIDIA CUDA
  VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation

(1) device(s) found on platform 0:
  -- 0 --
  DEVICE_NAME = GeForce GTX 650 Ti
  DEVICE_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
  DEVICE_VERSION = OpenCL 1.1 CUDA

Invalid Platform (please use either OpenCL or CUDA)

C:\Users\bruce\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe -platformId 0 -deviceId 0 -platform OpenCL -precision single --disable-splash
Explicit:
Checking for accuracy...done
5.84779 ns/day
Implicit:
Checking for accuracy...done
38.4752 ns/day

C:\Users\bruce\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe -platformId 0 -deviceId 0 -platform OpenCL -precision double --disable-splash
Explicit:
Checking for accuracy...done
1.80511 ns/day
Implicit:
Checking for accuracy...done
2.57122 ns/day
Yes this makes sense,

CUFFT comes with CUDA 5.0 - I wanted to avoid packaging a CUFFT for compatibility reasons (each CUFFT is specific to a CUDA release)
He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how

www.proteneer.com
proteneer
Pande Group Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:03 pm
Location: Stanford, CA
Contact:

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by proteneer »

Spongebob25 wrote:Version 4 give me an error in Windows 8------

This app can't run on your PC.
To find a version for your PC, check with the software publisher.

Code: Select all

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
(c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Windows\system32>cd C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe --display-devices --disable
-splash
Access is denied.

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>
Please advise.
Hm that is really strange. You shouldn't need administrator privileges (I don't think anyone else is running as admin).
He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how

www.proteneer.com
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by P5-133XL »

proteneer wrote:
bruce wrote:Do you plan to port FAHBench to Linux or OSX any time soon?
yes - it would be fairly easy to actually
If you can easily port FAHBench to Linux, Why has it been so hard to produce a GPU client for Linux? Doesn't FAHBench fold?
Image
Spongebob25
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:27 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus z490
i7 11700k
32 GB Gskill ram
Evga 2080 XC Black
1 TB Samsung 980 SSD

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by Spongebob25 »

proteneer wrote:
Spongebob25 wrote:Version 4 give me an error in Windows 8------

This app can't run on your PC.
To find a version for your PC, check with the software publisher.

Code: Select all

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
(c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Windows\system32>cd C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe --display-devices --disable
-splash
Access is denied.

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>
Please advise.
Hm that is really strange. You shouldn't need administrator privileges (I don't think anyone else is running as admin).
It gives me the same error no matter if I run it with or without admin privileges. Something has changed since ver. 3 that windows 8 does not like.
Image
proteneer
Pande Group Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:03 pm
Location: Stanford, CA
Contact:

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by proteneer »

Spongebob25 wrote:
proteneer wrote:
Spongebob25 wrote:Version 4 give me an error in Windows 8------

This app can't run on your PC.
To find a version for your PC, check with the software publisher.

Code: Select all

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
(c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Windows\system32>cd C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>FAHBench.exe --display-devices --disable
-splash
Access is denied.

C:\Users\Spongebob\Desktop\FAHBench_0_4>
Please advise.
Hm that is really strange. You shouldn't need administrator privileges (I don't think anyone else is running as admin).
It gives me the same error no matter if I run it with or without admin privileges. Something has changed since ver. 3 that windows 8 does not like.
Weird nothing was changed in the --display-devices part of the code. Can you check permissions on the file/folder it's in - what happens when you don't pass any arguments?
He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how

www.proteneer.com
Spongebob25
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:27 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus z490
i7 11700k
32 GB Gskill ram
Evga 2080 XC Black
1 TB Samsung 980 SSD

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by Spongebob25 »

Got it work. Had to delete it and re download it. One issue, running OpenCL on multiple cards only used 75% and 83% of the gpu.

29.9021 ns/day
Image
bruce
Posts: 20910
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta Testing

Post by bruce »

Preliminary trouble report.

According to popular opinion, drivers 310.90 provide better FAH stability than previous versions so I have been running on them.
When downloading the CUDA TOOLKIT it wanted to install an earlier version and I declined. I did not reboot (yet). Since that time, I've had two GPU timeout aborts, which have been EXTREMELY rare.

Code: Select all

02:40:34:WU01:FS01:0x15:Completed   4000000 out of 40000000 steps (10%).
02:49:34:WU01:FS01:0x15:Run: exception thrown in GuardedRun -- cannot continue further.
02:49:34:WU01:FS01:0x15:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=40000000
02:49:34:WU01:FS01:0x15:Work fraction=0.1038 steps=40000000.
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:logfile size=7370 infoLength=7370 edr=0 trr=23
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:+ Opened results file
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:- Writing 7906 bytes of core data to disk...
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:Done: 7394 -> 2590 (compressed to 35.0 percent)
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:  ... Done.
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
02:49:38:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: UNSTABLE_MACHINE (122 = 0x7a)
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:7623 run:276 clone:0 gen:85 core:0x15 unit:0x0000007c664f2dd14fe4fa026a9d395e
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:Uploading 3.03KiB to 171.64.65.105
02:49:38:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.105:8080
02:49:38:WU00:FS01:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
02:49:39:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
02:49:39:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)

Code: Select all

22:19:58:WU00:FS01:0x15:Completed    400000 out of 40000000 steps (1%).
22:31:02:WU00:FS01:0x15:Completed    800000 out of 40000000 steps (2%).
22:41:06:WU00:FS01:0x15:Run: exception thrown in GuardedRun -- cannot continue further.
22:41:06:WU00:FS01:0x15:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=40000000
22:41:07:WU00:FS01:0x15:Work fraction=0.0291 steps=40000000.
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:logfile size=7371 infoLength=7371 edr=0 trr=23
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:+ Opened results file
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:- Writing 7907 bytes of core data to disk...
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:Done: 7395 -> 2603 (compressed to 35.1 percent)
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:  ... Done.
22:41:10:WU00:FS01:0x15:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:0x15:
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
22:41:11:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: UNSTABLE_MACHINE (122 = 0x7a)
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:7626 run:701 clone:0 gen:35 core:0x15 unit:0x0000002a664f2dd14fe61dca458f7883
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:Uploading 3.04KiB to 171.64.65.105
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.105:8080
22:41:11:WU01:FS01:Connecting to assign-GPU.stanford.edu:80
22:41:11:WU01:FS01:News: Welcome to Folding@Home
22:41:11:WU01:FS01:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.105
22:41:11:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY gpu:0:"GK106 [GeForce GTX 650 Ti]" from 171.64.65.105
22:41:11:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.105:8080
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:Upload complete
22:41:11:WU00:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
My plan is to reboot to do any cleanup after installing the Toolkit, then reinstall 310.90 to make sure all updates are compatible with the newer drivers. Then I'll try the CUDA benchmarks again.

NOTE: Installing 310.90 graphics drivers includes something called NVidia Update which probably revises some of the supporting .dlls that TOOLKIT delivered.
Spongebob25
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:27 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus z490
i7 11700k
32 GB Gskill ram
Evga 2080 XC Black
1 TB Samsung 980 SSD

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by Spongebob25 »

OpenCL works fine but now I'm back to having an error running cuda.--OpenMMCUDA.dll:126. I have the tool kit installed and VS.
Image
PinHead
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:43 am
Hardware configuration: Quad Q9550 2.83 contains the GPU 57xx - running SMP and GPU
Quad Q6700 2.66 running just SMP
2P 32core Interlagos SMP on linux

Re: Folding@Home Benchmark Beta (0.4 Latest)

Post by PinHead »

Is the -platform OpenCL platformId independant? Can I run -deviceId 0,1 -platform OpenCL on a system with 1 AMD and 1 NVidia?

I get:
Explicit:
17.6456 ns/day

Implicit not supported on multiple devices.

AMD/NVidia
Win 7 64
FAHBench 0_4

I also get a no platformId specified.
Post Reply