Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby ChristianVirtual » Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:08 am

toTOW wrote:
The question is : why are we still getting work from this server (and almost exclusively from this one) ?


That's a feature of the new AS ... :wink:
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
User avatar
ChristianVirtual
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby sryckbos » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:38 am

Sorry about all the issues. I believe I've fixed the problem. Please let me know if it's still dumping. If it is I will stop the work server from assigning to go through it a second time.
sryckbos
Pande Group Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:23 pm

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby ChristianVirtual » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:46 am

Thanks; just restarted the slot ...
User avatar
ChristianVirtual
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby Joe_H » Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:11 am

The WS appears to be accepting WU's okay now. Checking from from work, I see a WU from Project 9022 credited to one of my machines within the last hour. I will check on the rest after I get home later tonight.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Joe_H
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6541
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:41 pm
Location: W. MA

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby ChristianVirtual » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:18 am

Finished one and got it accepted from backend server.
User avatar
ChristianVirtual
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby bruce » Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:17 am

I've been told that the problem with 171.64.65.124 has been resolved. If not, please report the time/date of both the WU download and upload.
bruce
 
Posts: 19854
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Porject 9018 Run 491, Clone 7, Gen 93 Server did not like

Postby bdo » Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:22 pm

Server did not like results, dumping WU. Same problem that last month with server 171.64.65.124.

Code: Select all
15:47:01:      Website: http://folding.stanford.edu/
15:47:01:    Copyright: (c) 2009-2014 Stanford University
15:47:01:       Author: Joseph Coffland <joseph@cauldrondevelopment.com>
15:47:01:         Args:
15:47:01:       Config: C:/Users/baudhuin/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/config.xml
15:47:01:******************************** Build ********************************
15:47:01:      Version: 7.4.4
15:47:01:         Date: Mar 4 2014
15:47:01:         Time: 20:26:54
15:47:01:      SVN Rev: 4130
15:47:01:       Branch: fah/trunk/client
15:47:01:     Compiler: Intel(R) C++ MSVC 1500 mode 1200
15:47:01:      Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /Qdiag-disable:4297,4103,1786,279 /Ox -arch:SSE
15:47:01:               /QaxSSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4.1,SSE4.2 /Qopenmp /Qrestrict /MT /Qmkl
15:47:01:     Platform: win32 XP
15:47:01:         Bits: 32
15:47:01:         Mode: Release
15:47:01:******************************* System ********************************
15:47:01:          CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
15:47:01:       CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5
15:47:01:         CPUs: 4
15:47:01:       Memory: 6.00GiB
15:47:01:  Free Memory: 4.63GiB
15:47:01:      Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
15:47:01:   OS Version: 6.2
15:47:01:  Has Battery: false
15:47:01:   On Battery: false
15:47:01:   UTC Offset: 1
15:47:01:          PID: 7944
15:47:01:          CWD: C:/Users/baudhuin/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient
15:47:01:           OS: Windows 10 Home
15:47:01:      OS Arch: AMD64
15:47:01:         GPUs: 1
15:47:01:        GPU 0: NVIDIA:1 G96 [GeForce 9400 GT]
15:47:01:         CUDA: 1.1
15:47:01:  CUDA Driver: 6050
15:47:01:Win32 Service: false
15:47:01:***********************************************************************
15:47:01:<config>
15:47:01:  <!-- Folding Slot Configuration -->
15:47:01:  <gpu v='false'/>
15:47:01:
15:47:01:  <!-- Network -->
15:47:01:  <proxy v=':8080'/>
15:47:01:
15:47:01:  <!-- Slot Control -->
15:47:01:  <pause-on-battery v='false'/>
15:47:01:  <power v='full'/>
15:47:01:
15:47:01:  <!-- User Information -->
15:47:01:  <passkey v='********************************'/>
15:47:01:  <team v='35819'/>
15:47:01:  <user v='Baudhuin'/>
15:47:01:
15:47:01:  <!-- Folding Slots -->
15:47:01:  <slot id='0' type='CPU'>
15:47:01:    <pause-on-start v='true'/>
15:47:01:  </slot>
15:47:01:</config>
15:47:02:Trying to access database...
15:47:07:Successfully acquired database lock
15:47:07:Enabled folding slot 00: PAUSED cpu:4 (by user)
15:47:17:FS00:Unpaused
-------
10:19:16:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:8080
10:19:17:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.124
10:19:17:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING cpu:4 from 171.64.65.124
10:19:17:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
10:19:19:WU01:FS00:Downloading 807.26KiB
10:19:25:WU01:FS00:Download 55.50%
10:19:26:WU01:FS00:Download complete
10:19:26:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:9018 run:491 clone:7 gen:93 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000070ab40417c55b2d3d2c2ba07be
10:22:47:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 80000 out of 80000 steps  (100%)
10:22:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Finished Work Unit:
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 4117896 from "00/wudata_01.trr": Read 4117896
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:trr file hash check passed.
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 3189052 from "00/wudata_01.xtc": Read 3189052
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed.
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:edr file hash check passed.
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:logfile size: 20700
10:23:00:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Leaving Run
10:23:03:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Writing 7330040 bytes of core data to disk...
10:23:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Done: 7329528 -> 7057989 (compressed to 96.2 percent)
10:23:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:  ... Done.
10:23:08:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Shutting down core
10:23:08:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:08:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
10:23:08:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
10:23:09:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9752 run:691 clone:0 gen:338 core:0xa4 unit:0x000001a6ab404163554172955f0d7d7d
10:23:09:WU00:FS00:Uploading 6.73MiB to 171.64.65.99
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:Starting
10:23:09:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/baudhuin/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 7944 -checkpoint 15 -np 4
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 1684
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:Core PID:4468
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 826125 -> 1399936 (decompressed 169.4 percent)
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=826125 data_size=1399936, decompressed_data_size=1399936 diff=0
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 491, Clone 7, Gen 93)
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
10:23:09:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
10:23:15:WU00:FS00:Upload 25.07%
10:23:15:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 4 to 4
10:23:15:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 0 out of 250000 steps  (0%)
10:23:21:WU00:FS00:Upload 80.78%
10:23:25:WU00:FS00:Upload complete
10:23:25:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
10:23:25:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 1728.00 points
10:23:25:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up
10:26:10:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps  (1%)
10:29:06:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps  (2%)
10:32:03:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps  (3%)
----
15:28:54:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 247500 out of 250000 steps  (99%)
15:28:55:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.67.108.45:8080
15:28:56:WU00:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.99
15:28:56:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING cpu:4 from 171.64.65.99
15:28:56:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080
15:29:00:WU00:FS00:Downloading 6.22MiB
15:29:06:WU00:FS00:Download 33.16%
15:29:09:WU00:FS00:Download complete
15:29:09:WU00:FS00:Received Unit: id:00 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:9752 run:4716 clone:0 gen:95 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000077ab4041635541776b7fd9b0f8
15:32:05:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Completed 250000 out of 250000 steps  (100%)
15:32:05:WU01:FS00:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Finished Work Unit:
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 811680 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 811680
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:trr file hash check passed.
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 746252 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 746252
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed.
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:edr file hash check passed.
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:logfile size: 23684
15:32:16:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Leaving Run
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Writing 1584104 bytes of core data to disk...
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Done: 1583592 -> 1538179 (compressed to 97.1 percent)
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:  ... Done.
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:- Shutting down core
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:19:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
15:32:20:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
15:32:20:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:9018 run:491 clone:7 gen:93 core:0xa4 unit:0x00000070ab40417c55b2d3d2c2ba07be
15:32:20:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
15:32:20:WU00:FS00:Starting
15:32:20:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.124:8080
15:32:20:WU00:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/baudhuin/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/web.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 704 -lifeline 7944 -checkpoint 15 -np 4
15:32:20:WU00:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 9676
15:32:20:WU00:FS00:Core PID:768
15:32:20:WU00:FS00:FahCore 0xa4 started
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:*------------------------------*
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Created dyn
15:32:21:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Files status OK
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Expanded 6522325 -> 22418284 (decompressed 343.7 percent)
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=6522325 data_size=22418284, decompressed_data_size=22418284 diff=0
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9752 (Run 4716, Clone 0, Gen 95)
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
15:32:23:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Entering M.D.
15:32:25:WU01:FS00:Upload complete
15:32:25:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
15:32:25:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping
15:32:26:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up
15:32:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Mapping NT from 4 to 4
Image
User avatar
bdo
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:56 am
Location: Bruxelles, Belgium

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby bretth603 » Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:53 pm

It's ba-ack! I've had WUs rejected from 3 different machines today - all 3 to 171.64.65.124.
bretth603
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby Joe_H » Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:25 am

I have notified the person in charge of this WS of the apparent return of the problem. As requested by bruce in his post, please report which WU's were dumped like this and the date and time.
Joe_H
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6541
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:41 pm
Location: W. MA

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby parkut » Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:59 am

Ive had 34 WU's get dumped in the last 12 hours. The problem is continuing

13:01:55:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 59, Clone 12, Gen 70)
15:37:24:WU02:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
15:37:29:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

14:05:52:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 596, Clone 0, Gen 55)
16:24:40:WU02:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
16:24:45:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

19:48:07:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9023 (Run 632, Clone 5, Gen 16)
00:52:57:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
00:55:06:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

11:59:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9021 (Run 365, Clone 6, Gen 63)
13:55:57:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
13:56:02:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

16:24:02:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9023 (Run 663, Clone 1, Gen 79)
18:20:29:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:20:35:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

18:20:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9028 (Run 741, Clone 1, Gen 23)
20:16:47:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
20:16:52:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

22:34:30:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9027 (Run 519, Clone 4, Gen 10)
00:29:37:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
00:29:41:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

13:35:53:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9026 (Run 421, Clone 5, Gen 53)
18:13:43:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:13:48:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

14:44:53:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9029 (Run 85, Clone 1, Gen 37)
16:36:50:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
16:36:55:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

17:08:26:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9017 (Run 17, Clone 14, Gen 37)
21:43:46:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
21:43:55:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

19:41:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9017 (Run 418, Clone 0, Gen 24)
21:34:29:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
21:34:34:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

21:34:29:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9026 (Run 360, Clone 6, Gen 11)
23:32:06:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
23:32:11:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

12:32:37:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9029 (Run 401, Clone 1, Gen 80)
14:14:19:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
14:14:25:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

13:48:50:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9024 (Run 250, Clone 3, Gen 45)
16:23:06:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
16:23:11:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

18:57:59:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9023 (Run 206, Clone 7, Gen 20)
21:34:05:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
21:34:10:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

16:23:07:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9025 (Run 749, Clone 0, Gen 71)
18:57:58:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:58:03:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

15:40:46:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9017 (Run 339, Clone 0, Gen 43)
17:18:14:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
17:18:19:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

13:02:28:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9026 (Run 925, Clone 4, Gen 66)
14:57:45:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
14:57:51:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

17:14:14:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9028 (Run 246, Clone 6, Gen 28)
19:11:16:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
19:11:20:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

16:45:57:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9029 (Run 337, Clone 3, Gen 29)
18:46:25:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:46:31:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

21:11:28:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9027 (Run 898, Clone 6, Gen 13)
23:04:20:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
23:04:25:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

17:36:38:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9022 (Run 816, Clone 1, Gen 28)
21:54:57:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
21:55:07:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

11:49:04:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 235, Clone 8, Gen 77)
14:05:51:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
14:05:56:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

16:24:40:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9028 (Run 464, Clone 3, Gen 88)
18:42:52:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:42:57:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

12:49:18:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9025 (Run 35, Clone 2, Gen 54)
17:22:07:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
17:22:12:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

12:35:19:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 136, Clone 9, Gen 76)
17:15:03:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
17:15:08:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

17:15:04:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9024 (Run 709, Clone 1, Gen 28)
21:49:53:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
21:49:59:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

15:00:17:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9024 (Run 928, Clone 3, Gen 58)
19:39:44:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
19:39:50:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

10:25:41:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9026 (Run 908, Clone 0, Gen 88)
15:00:17:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
15:00:22:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

19:39:44:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9027 (Run 388, Clone 0, Gen 17)
00:18:51:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
00:18:56:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

12:14:31:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9024 (Run 700, Clone 1, Gen 71)
16:50:55:WU00:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
16:51:04:WARNING:WU00:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

13:01:55:WU02:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9018 (Run 59, Clone 12, Gen 70)
15:37:24:WU02:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
15:37:29:WARNING:WU02:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

15:37:25:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9023 (Run 310, Clone 5, Gen 35)
18:11:49:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:11:54:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

14:47:12:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9021 (Run 428, Clone 9, Gen 36)
18:53:10:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
18:53:38:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

08:57:55:WU01:FS00:0xa4:Project: 9027 (Run 200, Clone 2, Gen 59)
13:32:29:WU01:FS00:Uploading 1.47MiB to 171.64.65.124
13:32:34:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping
Last edited by parkut on Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
parkut
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:33 am
Location: SE Michigan, USA

Re: Porject 9018 Run 491, Clone 7, Gen 93 Server did not lik

Postby sryckbos » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:11 am

I'm aware of the problem and am working on a fix. In the mean time, however, I'm going to stop assigning from this work server so this problem doesn't keep popping up while I'm fixing it.
sryckbos
Pande Group Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:23 pm

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby mattifolder » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:27 pm

Is it fixed now ?
mattifolder
 

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby bruce » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:02 am

mattifolder wrote:Is it fixed now ?


If sryckbos put the server is back on-line, then Yes, it's fixed.
bruce
 
Posts: 19854
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby Joe_H » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:33 am

From what I can tell from the logs linked on the serverstat page, it is online and accepting returns at least. But this server is not handling anywhere near the volume of WU returns as it was before this issue reoccurred. I do know that none of my systems have received any assignments from this WS in the last few days. So my assumption is that it is not yet fixed enough to be fully back.
Joe_H
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6541
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:41 pm
Location: W. MA

Re: Two smp disliked by server [171.64.65.124]

Postby sryckbos » Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:52 am

I haven't actually taken the work server down, but I have effectively stopped assignments from there, so that's where the discrepancy is. Will let you know when I have it running.

Sorry for the inconvenience!
sryckbos
Pande Group Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:23 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Issues with a specific server

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron