Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6312
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
I am guessing the IDs of other Super GPUs based on what we already know (and some unidentified IDs I found) :
- 2080 Super should be a TU102 chip, so it will likely be ID 0x1e81 which is between the last known TU102 ID and the first TU104 ID.
- 2070 Super should be a TU104 chip, so it should be (and confirmed once) ID 0x1e84 which is between known IDs of the two chips that equipped the 2080. 0x1ec7 is also a possible ID (it's still in the TU104 chips range), but it would more likely be a professional GPU judging by the surrounding IDs ...
- 2060 Super should be a TU106 chip, so it will likely be ID 0x1f06 which is between known IDs of the two chips that equipped the 2070 and the 2060.
I added them to GPUs.txt with "TBC" as the chip. Please confirm those IDs as soon as you get one of these GPUs ...
- 2080 Super should be a TU102 chip, so it will likely be ID 0x1e81 which is between the last known TU102 ID and the first TU104 ID.
- 2070 Super should be a TU104 chip, so it should be (and confirmed once) ID 0x1e84 which is between known IDs of the two chips that equipped the 2080. 0x1ec7 is also a possible ID (it's still in the TU104 chips range), but it would more likely be a professional GPU judging by the surrounding IDs ...
- 2060 Super should be a TU106 chip, so it will likely be ID 0x1f06 which is between known IDs of the two chips that equipped the 2070 and the 2060.
I added them to GPUs.txt with "TBC" as the chip. Please confirm those IDs as soon as you get one of these GPUs ...
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Seems like the higher core count helps folding more than gaming.
Average % increase of 2070 to 2070 super was 16%.
At 1,4M PPD, the 2070 Super folds about 25% faster.
I'm eager to know how the 2060 Super will do.
Average % increase of 2070 to 2070 super was 16%.
At 1,4M PPD, the 2070 Super folds about 25% faster.
I'm eager to know how the 2060 Super will do.
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Certainly something strange going on.
I still can't get the thing to appear as an option for folding so i guess i'll have to wait a few weeks and see if GPU-Z gets updated or something so i can get a better idea of what the card version actually is.
Thanks for the help and replies so far
I still can't get the thing to appear as an option for folding so i guess i'll have to wait a few weeks and see if GPU-Z gets updated or something so i can get a better idea of what the card version actually is.
Thanks for the help and replies so far
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
- Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2 - Location: W. MA
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Please post the beginning section of your log file, that will help show what the F@h client detects for your GPU. Include enough to show the folding configuration information.nodezeon wrote:Certainly something strange going on.
I still can't get the thing to appear as an option for folding so i guess i'll have to wait a few weeks and see if GPU-Z gets updated or something so i can get a better idea of what the card version actually is.
Thanks for the help and replies so far
iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Just a quick update,
I've gave it another shot tonight, completely reinstalled F@H and the nvidia drivers and voila it popped up right away.
Not sure if it was the client or the drivers but all sorted now so thanks for the help everyone, much appreciated.
I've gave it another shot tonight, completely reinstalled F@H and the nvidia drivers and voila it popped up right away.
Not sure if it was the client or the drivers but all sorted now so thanks for the help everyone, much appreciated.
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
When a science fiction writer (or maybe God, herself) endows a character with "super powers" you'll probably notice that many subsequent stories involve the unforeseen aspects of that endowment.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
Following roughly 65 hours of folding we have seen it up as high as 1.51M and as low as 1.28M, but we do seem to be averaging a shade over 1.4MMeeLee wrote:Seems like the higher core count helps folding more than gaming.
Average % increase of 2070 to 2070 super was 16%.
At 1,4M PPD, the 2070 Super folds about 25% faster.
I'm eager to know how the 2060 Super will do.
Right now on PRCG 11719 (0, 2463, 143) it's sitting pretty at an estimated 1,435,324 ppd which is in line with most other projects it's worked on.
Very happy indeed, it might not be best bang per buck but within my budget it's exactly the right return on investment.
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
I've always contended that FAH has always been about GFLOPS which is equivalent to (#Shaders @ GHz) ... [with an unnecessary factor of 2]. Other features don't help FAH or only make only incremental differences.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6312
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
It might change on other kind of WUs ...Shirty wrote:Following roughly 65 hours of folding we have seen it up as high as 1.51M and as low as 1.28M, but we do seem to be averaging a shade over 1.4MMeeLee wrote:Seems like the higher core count helps folding more than gaming.
Average % increase of 2070 to 2070 super was 16%.
At 1,4M PPD, the 2070 Super folds about 25% faster.
I'm eager to know how the 2060 Super will do.
Right now on PRCG 11719 (0, 2463, 143) it's sitting pretty at an estimated 1,435,324 ppd which is in line with most other projects it's worked on.
Very happy indeed, it might not be best bang per buck but within my budget it's exactly the right return on investment.
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
I'll update the thread if there are any significant changes to the output (that I pick up on).
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
When gamer sites post gaming improvements of 10-16%, I guess the remaining 10-15% we can attribute to the return bonus?
Most points are made from the Quick return bonus anyway; it doesn't accurately represents the amount of work load done.
With RTX cards, I presume in the near future, they can lower the return bonus by a bit; as, if in the future GPUs will be even faster, and we'd have to start counting in billion points per day.
We might as well go with scientific notation (I gained 8e6 points today )
Most points are made from the Quick return bonus anyway; it doesn't accurately represents the amount of work load done.
With RTX cards, I presume in the near future, they can lower the return bonus by a bit; as, if in the future GPUs will be even faster, and we'd have to start counting in billion points per day.
We might as well go with scientific notation (I gained 8e6 points today )
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
This isn't quite the way FAH sees it.MeeLee wrote:When gamer sites post gaming improvements of 10-16%, I guess the remaining 10-15% we can attribute to the return bonus?
Most points are made from the Quick return bonus anyway; it doesn't accurately represents the amount of work load done.
If WU is slated to expire in N hours, it takes the same amount of gaming resources to complete it in N hours or to complete it in N/10 or N/100 but the scientific value of finishing it in 10% of the time is more than delaying the result until 100% of the allotted time and it's worth MUCH MORE to science if someone completes it in 1% of the allotted time.
Looking at it another way, if a project can be completed in 10 years, completing it in a year is a lot better for science and it's even better if someone can complete the project in 36.5 days.
As a result, the bonus points for a powerful GPU will be significantly higher than for a GPU that takes longer to complete exactly the same calculations -- quite unlike the measurements as seen by the gamer. FAH Points are awarded both for the calculations you do complete AND for how rapidly you complete them.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6312
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
2080 Super confirmed as 0x1e81, 2070 Super as 0x1e84 and 2060 as 0x1f06.
I still don't know what 0x1ec7 is and why someone got a GPU with this ID ...
I still don't know what 0x1ec7 is and why someone got a GPU with this ID ...
-
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Please could you whitelist the RTX 2070 Super?
0x1ec7 is a nvidia rtx 2070 super variant.
0x1f47 is a nvidia rtx 2060 super variant.
0x1F42 is a nvidia rtx 2060 super variant.
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view ... w?expand=0
0x1f47 is a nvidia rtx 2060 super variant.
0x1F42 is a nvidia rtx 2060 super variant.
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view ... w?expand=0