Page 11 of 13
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 12:18 pm
by toTOW
Results from my GTX 980M
OpenCL - DP:
Explicit: 3.50513 ns/day
Implicit: 7.30925 ns/day
OpenCL - SP:
Explicit: 50.727 ns/day - GPU is only used at 80%
Implicit: 216.631 ns/day
CUDA test is not working : Error loading library D:\FAHBench/OpenMMCUDA.dll: 126
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 2:37 pm
by bruce
It works for me with FAHBench_1_2_0
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 4:39 pm
by 7im
toTOW, which version of the CUDA SDK do you have installed?
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 10:21 pm
by toTOW
None ... it's been a long time since the runtimes have been included in regular drivers (both for ATI and NV). And before, they were packaged with the client/program that needed them.
From BOINC client point of view :
21-May-2015 08:19:22 [---] CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 980M (driver version 352.86, CUDA version 7.5, compute capability 5.2, 4096MB, 3066MB available, 3461 GFLOPS peak)
21-May-2015 08:19:22 [---] OpenCL: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 980M (driver version 352.86, device version OpenCL 1.2 CUDA, 4096MB, 3066MB available, 3461 GFLOPS peak)
From FAH client point of view (I didn't notice that OpenCL detection was missing in FAH client) :
15:49:09: GPU 0: NVIDIA:5 GM204 [GeForce GTX 980M]
15:49:09: CUDA: 5.2
15:49:09: CUDA Driver: 7050
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 11:36 pm
by 7im
Okay, what version of CUDA does the FAHBench page say is needed? The original defunct one, or the
page I made to keep it alive on the FAH web site.
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:26 pm
by toTOW
Results from my R9 290X
OpenCL - DP:
Explicit: 9.86929 ns/day
Implicit: 22.6624 ns/day
OpenCL - SP:
Explicit: 57.2944 ns/day
Implicit: 190.162 ns/day
Edit : results from FahBench version using OpenMM 6.2 :
https://github.com/pandegroup/fahbench/ ... /tag/2.0.1
OpenCL - DP:
Explicit: 7.3753 ns/day
Implicit: 13.5304 ns/day
OpenCL - SP:
Explicit: 42.2597 ns/day
Implicit: 123.6936 ns/day
The performance issue is clearly seen on these benchmarks.
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 1:22 am
by Trendle
Trendle wrote:Some SP results comparing the latest Catalyst driver to pre-Omega release.
Radeon HD 7970
Catalyst 15.4 @1110 MHz
Catalyst 14.9 @1100 MHz (1110 MHz not stable)
Catalyst 13.12 @1100 MHz (1110 MHz not stable)
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:32 pm
by DarthBaggins
Going to have to try this out, want to see the results of my 5930k and 970 with them both oc'd
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:07 pm
by foldy
A german computer magazine tested the best NVIDIA and AMD GPUs with FahBench 1.2.0 (OpenMM 5.1) on Windows 8.1
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-06/amd- ... e-fahbench
Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon R9 290X
Please add to list.
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:44 am
by DarkFoss
Here's my FuryX results Windows 8.1 x64 AMD 15.7 driver I did not run any DP. AMD FX 8350 Sapphire Fury X nothing overclocked.
2.0.2 run with the following commands since the gui didn't work :
FAHBench-cmd --device-id 0 --platform OpenCL --precision single --solvent implicit
FAHBench-cmd --device-id 0 --platform OpenCL --precision single --solvent explicit
Code: Select all
FahBench 1.0
Fiji
Opencl-SP
Explicit Solvent 34.9122 ns/day.
Implicit Solvent 197.035 ns/day.
FahBench 1.2
Fiji
Opencl-SP
Explicit Solvent 60.2216 ns/day
Implicit Solvent 253.573 ns/day
FahBench 2.0.2 Windows-x64-nocuda
Fiji
Opencl SP
Explicit 46.2156
Implicit 163.2585
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:29 am
by foldy
Anandtech tested top Nvidia and AMD GPUs
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9421/the- ... re-asus/16
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Please add to list.
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:23 pm
by Hughesy26
My results - all OpenCL single precision
GTX 480: Explicit: 19.4645 Implicit: 83.2494
i5 4690k: Explicit: 3.01561 Implicit: 3.78837
GTX 840M: 4.4245 Implicit: 23.21
i5 4210M: 1.41124 Implicit: 1.52605
Bizarrely my desktop (top 2 results) gets the same PPD as my laptop
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 8:00 pm
by Ascetus
OpenCL double precision
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:24 am
by Ascetus
OpenCL SP
Double precision in FAH is pointless?
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 12:51 pm
by toTOW
Yes, it's not used in FAH.