Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Pette Broad
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:38 pm
Hardware configuration: CPU folding on only one machine a laptop

GPU Hardware..
3 x 460
1 X 260
4 X 250

+ 1 X 9800GT (3 days a week)
Location: Chester U.K

Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

Post by Pette Broad »

First one of these I've seen, got it using advmethods on 2.2ghz dual core Vista machine. Assuming the 25 point credit is correct then it's running at 0.7 pph and won't meet the initial 24 hour deadline. I can't see any problem with CPU usage and the other core is getting 7.0 pph :?

After leaving it running overnight I's say that this needs a benchmark retest as credit is out by a factor of 10 and preferred deadline needs extending or there's going to be a lot of duplication and wasted CPU cycles!

Code: Select all

[18:17:43] + 3020800 bytes downloaded
[18:17:43] + 3028899 bytes downloaded
[18:17:43] Verifying core Core_a4.fah...
[18:17:43] Signature is VALID
[18:17:43] 
[18:17:43] Trying to unzip core FahCore_a4.exe
[18:17:45] Decompressed FahCore_a4.exe (10057216 bytes) successfully
[18:17:50] + Core successfully engaged
[18:17:55] 
[18:17:55] + Processing work unit
[18:17:55] Core required: FahCore_a4.exe
[18:17:55] Core found.
[18:17:55] Working on queue slot 02 [February 15 18:17:55 UTC]
[18:17:55] + Working ...
[18:17:55] 
[18:17:55] *------------------------------*
[18:17:55] Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
[18:17:55] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
[18:17:55] 
[18:17:55] Preparing to commence simulation
[18:17:55] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[18:17:55] - Not checking prior termination.
[18:17:56] - Expanded 55472 -> 203980 (decompressed 367.7 percent)
[18:17:56] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=55472 data_size=203980, decompressed_data_size=203980 diff=0
[18:17:56] - Digital signature verified
[18:17:56] 
[18:17:56] Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)
[18:17:56] 
[18:17:56] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[18:17:56] Entering M.D.
[18:18:01] Mapping NT from 1 to 1 
[18:18:01] Completed 0 out of 10000000 steps  (0%)
[18:35:29] Completed 100000 out of 10000000 steps  (1%)
[18:52:55] Completed 200000 out of 10000000 steps  (2%)
[19:10:24] Completed 300000 out of 10000000 steps  (3%)
[19:27:52] Completed 400000 out of 10000000 steps  (4%)
[19:45:19] Completed 500000 out of 10000000 steps  (5%)
[20:02:52] Completed 600000 out of 10000000 steps  (6%)
[20:20:22] Completed 700000 out of 10000000 steps  (7%)
[20:37:51] Completed 800000 out of 10000000 steps  (8%)
[20:55:22] Completed 900000 out of 10000000 steps  (9%)

Thanks,

Pete
Image
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3111
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

Post by sortofageek »

The WU (P10074,R0,C0,G3) has been reported as a bad WU.

I reported this one bad because there is something strange about it. Two different folders appear to have completed it successfully, but one of those seems to have completed it "eleventy-three" times. While that can be explained by the fact that folder actually has a large fleet of computers, it seems the reassignments should have stopped sooner.
Pette Broad
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:38 pm
Hardware configuration: CPU folding on only one machine a laptop

GPU Hardware..
3 x 460
1 X 260
4 X 250

+ 1 X 9800GT (3 days a week)
Location: Chester U.K

Re: Project: 10074 (Run 0, Clone 0, Gen 3)

Post by Pette Broad »

O.K, thanks, I may as well leave it to complete now as its at 95%.


Pete
Image
Post Reply