[22:19:47] Project: 2795 (Run 1, Clone 8, Gen 3)
[22:19:47]
[22:19:47] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[22:19:47] Entering M.D.
[22:19:53] Working on p2795_lam5w_330K
[22:19:54] Starting GUI Server
[22:20:24] Completed 1%
[22:20:46] Completed 2%
[22:21:07] Completed 3%
[22:21:07] mdrun_gpu returned -1
[22:21:07] Going to send back what have done.
[22:21:07] logfile size: 658457
[22:21:07] - Writing 658995 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:21:07] Done: 658483 -> 57847 (compressed to 8.7 percent)
[22:21:07] ... Done.
[22:21:07]
[22:21:07] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[22:21:11] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[22:21:11] Sending work to server
Specs:
HD3870 (800/1125) - Stock timings from MSI (Catalyst 8.4)
AMD 5000+ OC'd to 2990 GHz.
Running on a stock Q6600 with 3 CPU clients and HD3650 (Saphire/512MB) with Windows Vista Family Premium SP1 (french) and Catalyst 8.3
Averaging now 2282PPD
Sinse my las post I've had the exact same type of EUE with every 2794/95/96 I've had to fold (6).
Five have been fully credited and the sixth EUE'ed after the last stats update and I'm folding a seventh.
In between, two p4707 have completed normaly.
What's going on ?
Is there someone I should be talking to directly about these problems? Do the powers to be even know about these problems? I have spent countless hours tweaking my system but I still get the same results with 2794, 2795, and 2796 WUs. It appears the problem is happening to multiple people now so I am almost convinced it isn't my system based on this and how well all the other GPU WUs run on my boxen.
psummary shows densign as the contact for these projects. Does anyone have contact info for him?
But then again, I have done several of those WUs. Not one EUE.
Running two 2600s.
Abit AW8D - PD 920@3350 - 2 X Sapphire HD2600 600/500 @ 720/500
If running one instance I get:
Just over 1 minute a frame for 2794/95/96
Just over 2 minute a frame for 2799/4700/01/07
If running two instances I get the same times on the 2794/95/96
but the 2799/4700/01/07 go to 5 minutes a frame. Setting the configure for more priority, or
anything else, hasn't gotten the times much smaller. Got to do some more testing. I think it
has something to due with primary or secondary monitor. Though if I set the secondary monitor
to primary, it doesn't change anything.
I am going to change which cards they use after completion of these. Saving the files, so I can test
things out without losing any.
Anyone have any ideas on this?
