Update_Core status on a work unit.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
scm2000
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:13 am

Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by scm2000 »

I've got a work unit stuck in Update_Core:

-----------------------------------------

Code: Select all

12:45:59:WU00:FS01:FahCore 0x22 started
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:*********************** Log Started 2020-05-04T12:45:59Z ***********************
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:*************************** Core22 Folding@home Core ***************************
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Type: 0x22
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Core: Core22
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:    Website: https://foldingathome.org/
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:  Copyright: (c) 2009-2018 foldingathome.org
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:     Author: John Chodera <john.chodera@choderalab.org> and Rafal Wiewiora
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:             <rafal.wiewiora@choderalab.org>
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Args: -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 706 -lifeline 9736 -checkpoint 15
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:             -gpu-vendor nvidia -opencl-platform 1 -opencl-device 2 -cuda-device
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:             2 -gpu 2
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:     Config: <none>
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:************************************ Build *************************************
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:    Version: 0.0.2
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Date: Dec 6 2019
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Time: 21:30:31
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22: Repository: Git
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:   Revision: abeb39247cc72df5af0f63723edafadb23d5dfbe
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:     Branch: HEAD
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:   Compiler: Visual C++ 2008
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:    Options: /TP /nologo /EHa /wd4297 /wd4103 /Ox /MT
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:   Platform: win32 10
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Bits: 64
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       Mode: Release
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:************************************ System ************************************
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:        CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:     CPU ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 9
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:       CPUs: 2
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:     Memory: 7.70GiB
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Free Memory: 3.52GiB
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:    Threads: WINDOWS_THREADS
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22: OS Version: 6.2
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Has Battery: false
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22: On Battery: false
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22: UTC Offset: -4
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:        PID: 8464
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:        CWD: C:\Users\steph\AppData\Roaming\FAHClient\work
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:         OS: Windows 10 Pro
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:    OS Arch: AMD64
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:********************************************************************************
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Project: 13402 (Run 33, Clone 183, Gen 0)
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Unit: 0x0000000112bc7d9a5eafa8f54d8ddd97
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:ERROR:110: Need version 0.0.5
12:45:59:WU00:FS01:0x22:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CORE_OUTDATED
12:46:00:WARNING:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: CORE_OUTDATED (110 = 0x6e)
What should I do?
JimboPalmer
Posts: 2573
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by JimboPalmer »

So far as I know, those are in beta. (i am not a member of the beta team)

Are you a member of the beta team? This should be posted there.

Do you have a beta flag even though you are not a member of the beta team? Remove the beta flag.

Are you getting this as a regular volunteer? This is the place to raise the issue.
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
scm2000
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:13 am

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by scm2000 »

I'm not on the beta team... I never set any beta flag.. this is just a stock install of FAH.
JimboPalmer
Posts: 2573
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:12 am
Location: Greenwood MS USA

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by JimboPalmer »

I see this in advanced, maybe it leaked out.

add to this thread

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=35063&p=332176&hilit=13400#p332176
Tsar of all the Rushers
I tried to remain childlike, all I achieved was childish.
A friend to those who want no friends
JohnChodera
Pande Group Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:59 pm

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by JohnChodera »

That's weird! core22 0.0.5 was released to full FAH a week ago. You should be able to pick it up without problems.
Can you try deleting your core and work directories and seeing if that picks up the new core?
If not, we'll investigate ASAP!

~ John Chodera // MSKCC
HaloJones
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:16 am

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by HaloJones »

cores are stored in %APPDATA%\FAHclient\cores
single 1070

Image
scm2000
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:13 am

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by scm2000 »

JohnChodera wrote:That's weird! core22 0.0.5 was released to full FAH a week ago. You should be able to pick it up without problems.
Can you try deleting your core and work directories and seeing if that picks up the new core?
If not, we'll investigate ASAP!

~ John Chodera // MSKCC
I'll do that as soon as my other 2 work units complete.
astrorob
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 7:59 pm

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by astrorob »

i have a machine with 3 GPUS, one fast, one middling and one slow.

the two faster GPUs are showing state "UPDATE_CORE" in fahclient. they are not requesting work units.

the slower GPU is still working on a WU which will take 2 more days to complete.

i think this means that the client is waiting for the FahCore22 that's still running to finish before trying to update the binary. does that sound right? i'm going to waste 2 days of 2 faster GPUs if this is true. is there a way for me to abandon the WU on the slow GPU and cause the core update to complete?

thanks!
Image
astrorob
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 7:59 pm

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by astrorob »

well, it was enough to pause the slow GPU. for some reason i then got an error in one of the slot logs saying the core binary could not be overwritten but maybe that's because another slot was writing it. the two slots waiting on UPDATE_CORE then immediately started up on 0.0.5.

the slow GPU checkpoint loaded OK on the new core binary after unpausing.
Image
scm2000
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:13 am

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by scm2000 »

it makes sense it would not update the core until the other work units complete...
ah but I did pause everthing, they all went to update_core.. then unpausing it updated, then they all started running again.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7870
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by Joe_H »

Yes, this is an issue with more than one folding slot using a core. All need to be inactive before a core update will proceed.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
JohnChodera
Pande Group Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:59 pm

Re: Update_Core status on a work unit.

Post by JohnChodera »

We've heard reports that you can pause the active WUs and resume them with the updated core just fine. Might be worth trying if you don't want to wait!

~ John Chodera // MSKCC
Post Reply