Does this mean that the upcoming core also solves the problem where FAH couldn't cope with multiple OpenCL platforms on the same computer - e.g. if you had both an Nvidia and AMD card in the same computer, or you had both ROCm and AMDGPUPro OpenCL installed?PantherX wrote: 1) Let me see how many platforms I have access to
GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
Online: GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1080, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580 + occasional CPU folding in the cold.
Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 960, GTX 950
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
I do not know whether that problem has been fully solved or not, but I do know it's being worked on.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7020
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
Great question! Assuming you have access to such a system, once FahCore_22 version 0.0.13 is released to FULL, you can give it a shot and see what happens. I would personally consider these edge cases which can be very hard to replicate in the lab due to hardware constraints. However, if you're willing to test it out and provide feedback, we might be able to support it in future.gunnarre wrote:[...Does this mean that the upcoming core also solves the problem where FAH couldn't cope with multiple OpenCL platforms on the same computer...
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
multiple openCL platforms should be the default when CPU has integrated GPU too and a dedicated GPU is also attached.
Last edited by foldy on Sun Sep 27, 2020 7:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7020
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
I am not sure if multiple OpenCL platforms can be used simultaneously. However, I do know that GROMACS does support GPU off-loading when performing CPU tasks. Let's wait and see what happens with FahCore_22 and FahCore_a8.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:12 am
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
[snip]
index.php
Has he noticed that a SEPARATE account must be created for the forum before any posts become possible?road-runner wrote:Maybe not I was thinking the same thing I posted a link to here maybe he will answer what projects/PPD
says he can never post here on the forum says authorization needed, here is a log on one..
index.php
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
I just noticed my stats for my 2080Ti showing >4m PPD for the past 2 days on extreemeoverclocking. The PPD were 4.5m yesterday, 5m for the entry just added in the past few minutes for today and the core it is running now is estimating 4.7m PPD at over 50% completion.
The current work unit is a new 0.0.13 core_22. I didn't scour my logs for stats on the cores, but my first 0.0.13 core downloaded on the 24th and now my log is full of them (180 occurences according to grep|wc).
(I mention this because these were close to the figures that were predicted in an earlier post for a 3080, but I'm seeing them on a 2080Ti. Most of mine are project 13426, though. Wondering what the newer cards will get now that 0.0.13 is out there...?)
The current work unit is a new 0.0.13 core_22. I didn't scour my logs for stats on the cores, but my first 0.0.13 core downloaded on the 24th and now my log is full of them (180 occurences according to grep|wc).
(I mention this because these were close to the figures that were predicted in an earlier post for a 3080, but I'm seeing them on a 2080Ti. Most of mine are project 13426, though. Wondering what the newer cards will get now that 0.0.13 is out there...?)
PantherX wrote:Some quick numbers from Project 11765 in Linux:HaloJones wrote:will be very interested to see what 0.0.13 can do with a 3080
TPF 73s - GTX 1080Ti running OpenCL/ 1.554 M PPD
TPF 57s - GTX 1080Ti running CUDA / 2.253 M PPD
TPF 49s - RTX 2080Ti running OpenCL/ 2.826 M PPD
TPF 39s - RTX 2080Ti running CUDA / 3.981 M PPD
TPF 36s - RTX 3080 running OpenCL / 4.489 M PPD
TPF 31s - RTX 3080 running CUDA / 5.618 M PPD
I do expect that the numbers might potentially be better once the drivers have matured a bit, generally in about 6 months. By that time, we might have a new version of FahCore_22 that can unlock more performance too!
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 7020
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
The figures I posted were from a traditional F@H Project where CUDA brought in 15% to 30% improvement (reduction in TPF). However, for the Moonshot WUs, that can range from 50% to 400% and Project 13426 is a Moonshot Project.
EDIT, here's data for 3090 too:
Project 11765 on Linux
TPF: 73s - 1080 Ti OpenCL
TPF: 57s - 1080 Ti CUDA
TPF: 49s - 2080 Ti OpenCL
TPF: 39s - 2080 Ti CUDA
TPF: 36s - 3080 OpenCL
TPF: 31s - 3080 CUDA
TPF: 30s - 3090 OpenCL
TPF: 26s - 3090 CUDA
EDIT, here's data for 3090 too:
Project 11765 on Linux
TPF: 73s - 1080 Ti OpenCL
TPF: 57s - 1080 Ti CUDA
TPF: 49s - 2080 Ti OpenCL
TPF: 39s - 2080 Ti CUDA
TPF: 36s - 3080 OpenCL
TPF: 31s - 3080 CUDA
TPF: 30s - 3090 OpenCL
TPF: 26s - 3090 CUDA
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6309
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
All known Ampere GPUs have been added to GPUs.txt :
Code: Select all
2204 GA102 [GeForce RTX 3090]
2206 GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 10GB / 20GB]
222b GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Engineering Sample]
222f GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 11GB Engineering Sample]
2230 GA102GL [Quadro RTX 48GB]
223f GA102GL
2482 GA104 [GeForce RTX 3070 Ti]
2484 GA104 [GeForce RTX 3070]
2486 GA104 [GeForce RTX 3060 Ti]
249c GA104M [GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile]
249d GA104M [GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile / Max-Q]
24af GA104 [GeForce RTX 3070 Engineering Sample]
24bf GA104 [GeForce RTX 3070 Engineering Sample]
252f GA106 [GeForce RTX 3060 Engineering Sample]
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
interesting confirmation of the TI models ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
single 1070
![Image](https://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?u=41261)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6309
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
2230 / GA102GL [Quadro RTX 48GB] updated with commercial name : 2230 / GA102GL [RTX A6000]
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
Anyone running a large atom WU on a 3090 and on a 4 to 5Ghz CPU, would want to run HWMonitor (in Windows) or HTOP in Linux, to see how much percent the GPU takes of one CPU core? (If you have a multi core CPU, perhaps it's best to disable HT/SMT in the bios, and only run between 2 to 4 cores. Should make determining the max CPU frequency easier).
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
What could we expect from the 3060Ti?
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
Hard to say looks by cores that it could be similar to a RTX 2070/80 but lots of variables, a promising new member of the elusive 3000 series family.JohnG__ wrote:What could we expect from the 3060Ti?
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .
Team page: http://www.rationalskepticism.org
Re: GeForce RTX 3080 and 3090 support enabled !
First results can be seen here: https://folding.lar.systems/gpu_ppd/bra ... tx_3060_tiJohnG__ wrote:What could we expect from the 3060Ti?